We have a continued need for a plain text field to indicate a custom grouping or collection.
Under GBL 1.0, this was entered in dct_isPartOf_sm as linkable plain text.
Under OGM Aardvark, the options for this are:
Create a separate record to represent the collection. Use the pcdm_memberOf_sm field or dct_isPartOf_sm to establish a relationship
Use the uncontrolled dct_subject_sm field for custom values
Options from other schemas
mri:aggregateDataSetName - from ISO to group datasets
schema.org/targetCollection - to indicate a collection; the addition of target helps distinguish the URI from the value of collection that is in the Dublin Core Type field as well as our "Resource Type" field.
schema.org/about - a very general field that can take a subject
Background
We have a continued need for a plain text field to indicate a custom grouping or collection.
dct_isPartOf_sm
as linkable plain text.pcdm_memberOf_sm
field ordct_isPartOf_sm
to establish a relationshipdct_subject_sm
field for custom valuesOptions from other schemas
target
helps distinguish the URI from the value ofcollection
that is in the Dublin Core Type field as well as our "Resource Type" field.Suggestions for custom options
gbl_collection_sm
gbl_grouping_sm
ogm_collection_sm
ogm_subcollection_sm
Considerations
Pluses:
Cons:
Related issues
43
https://github.com/OpenGeoMetadata/GeoCombine/pull/143 Geo4LibCamp 24 discussion