jduff-chs
commented
8 years ago For reference, here is how they are currently encoded:
Page 4 (left) of 016:
<pb n="v.9.p.4"/>
<p>recepti. Et ut seiatis non solum
quatuor evangelia. sed plurima
esse conscripta, e quibus haec,
quae habemus, electa sunt et <milestone unit="altpage" n="87"/>
<lb n="5"/>tiadita ecclesiis, ex ipso proocemio
Lucae, quod ita contexitur, cognoscamus:
> Quoniam quidem
multi conati sunt ordinare narrationem<
Hoc quod ait: >conati
<lb n="10"/> sunt<, latentem habet accusationem
eorum, qui absque gratia
Spiritus sancti ad scribenda evangelia
prosiluerunt. Matthaeus
quippe et Marcus et Joannes et
<lb n="15"/> Lucas non sunt >conati< scribere,
sed Spiritu sancto pleni scripserunt
evangelia. > Multi< igitur
> conati sunt ordinare narrationem
de his rebus, quae manifestissime
<lb n="20"/> festissime cognitae sunt in nobis <
Ecclesia quatuor habet evangelia,
ζῖται < οὐ πάντα ἐνέκριναν, ἀλλα τινα
αὐτῶν ἐξελέξαντο.</p>
<p>Τάχα δὲ καὶ τὸ >ἐπεχείρησαν <
λεληθυῖαν ἔχει κατηγορίαν τῶν προπετῶς
καὶ χωρὶς χαρίσματος ἐλθόντων
ἐπὶ τὴν ἀναγραφὴν τῶν εὐαγγελίων.
Ματθαῖος γὰρ οὐκ >ἐπεχείρησεν<
ἀλλ᾿ ἔγραφεν ἀπὸ ἁγίου
πνεύματος, ὁμοίως καὶ Μᾶρκος καὶ
Ἰωάννης, παραπλησίως δὲ καὶ
Λουκᾶς.</p>Page 83 (right) of 030:
<pb n="v.10.p.83"/>
<p>προφητῶν εἰρηκότος »ζῶ ἐγώ«, ***
<lb n="5"/>
καὶ***
<lb n="10"/> ἐμὲ ἐγκατέλιπον, πηγὴν ὕδατος
ζῶντος«. καὶ ζωὴ δὲ ὡς ἀπὸ πηγῆς
ζωῆς τοῦ πατρὸς ὁ εἰπών· ἐγώ
εἰμι ἡ ζωή«. καὶ πρόσχες ἐπιμελῶς
εἰ μή, ὥσπερ οὐ ταὐτόν ἐστι
<lb n="15"/> πηγὴ ποταμοῦ καὶ ποταμός, οὕτως
πηγὴ ζωῆς καὶ ζωή.
καὶ ταῦτα δὲ προσεθήκαμεν διὰ
τὸ προσκεῖσθαι τῷ σὺ εἶ ὁ Χριστὸς
ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ τὸ
<lb n="20"/> τοῦ ζῶντος· ἐξαίρετον γάρ τι
ἐχρῆν παραστῆσαι ἐν τῷ λεγομένῳ
περὶ τοῦ θεοῦ καὶ πατρὸς
τῶν ὅλων, ὡς ζῶντος παρά τε
τὴν αὐτοζωὴν καὶ τὰ μετέχοντα
<lb n="25"/> αὐτῆς. ἐπεὶ δὲ εἴπομεν μὴ ἀπό
τινων ὑγιῶν δογμάτων εἰρηκέναι
τοὺς ἀποφηναμένους εἶναι τὸν ᾿Ιησοῦν
Ἰωάννην τὸν βαπτιστὴν
ἤ τινα τῶν ἐπιφερομένων, κατασκευάσωμεν
<lb n="30"/> καὶ τοῦτο λέγοντες ὅτι,
εἰ παρατετεύχεισαν ἐπὶ τὸ βάπτισμα
ἀπεληλυθότι τῷ Ἰησοῦ πρὸς τὸν</p>
<p>et forsitan ideo dicebatur vivus,
secundum eminentiam qua supereminet
omnibus habentibus in
se vitam, quoniam et »solus habet
« et est fons vitae.
et fons quidem vitae proprie dicitur
deus pater, qui dicit per Hiere-
miam:
»me dereHquerunt fontem aquae
vivaea. vita autem est quasi de
fonte vitae patris procedens, qui
dixit: »ego sum vita«. et vide
quoniam sicut non est idipsum
fons <fluvii> et fluvius, sic non
idipsum fons vitae et vita.</p>
annettegessner
ChiaraPalladino
PonteIneptique
byeats
lcerrato
These texts, of different works by Origenes, each contain fragmentary attestations of portions of a work in both Latin and Greek. For example, see the page below, from tlg2042/tlg016, the homilies on Luke. The (mostly complete) text of the surviving Latin translation is in the left column, and the extant (more fragmentary) original Greek portions are in the right column, aligned so that they are matched with the Latin.
I'd imagine we'd want to separate these into Greek and Latin files, but it seems like we'll encounter some issues in this. For one, I can't think of a way to encode these correspondences. Another issue: the line numbers on the left of every page are meant to cite both the Greek and Latin, but only turn up in the XML on the Latin, as that's the text they are closest to. This ends up being an even greater issue in tlg030, a commentary on Matthew.
Here, Greek is on the left and Latin on the right, and both are equally fragmentary. Again, here, all line numbers are recorded in the left column's text, here the Greek. But this means that where the Greek is absent but Latin is present, there are line numbers meant to refer to Latin text, stranded in large lacunae in the midst of the Greek.
Does anyone have ideas for how we might encode the correspondence between two files while still splitting them? (is the correspondence worth preserving?) Any ideas (short of manual entry) for how to apply the line numbering to both texts? (is full line numbering important?)
N.B.: Someone was in the middle of separating the two texts in tlg030: tlg030...grc1 contains only the Greek text as far as I've checked, but tlg030...lat1 is the full text, both the Latin and the Greek portions. Neither currently passes Hook, because of duplicate sections.