Open jjiwooLim opened 10 months ago
Notes from UFO Socialization:
Slide 11 -
Need to document that if both are set then the property file with take precedence
Slide 12 -
Adjust the bypass wording since its slightly hidden behind the image
Slide 18 -
Specify that docker can also use no_proxy
Slide 30 -
Remove L3 queue
Other points to follow up -
Need to check if proxies work with our maven plugins, and if not then the issue will need to be opened against them.
Follow ups: Updated UFO slides. Checked and tested that proxies work with LMP using Maven settings. Maven/Gradle follow a different path to download artifacts(Liberty features) from Maven repsoitories so it does not have any impact by this feature
@jjiwooLim where is the UFO? There isn't a link in the description to it.
@NottyCode Added the UFO link in the description.
@jjiwooLim isn't it usual for env var names to be all upper case rather than all lower case?
@NottyCode that might be the usual way, but we followed the proxy env var convention used in featureUtility : https://openliberty.io/docs/latest/reference/command/featureUtility-commands.html#mod
@OpenLiberty/demo-approvers Demo scheduled for EOI 24.22
Serviceability Approval Comment - Please answer the following questions for serviceability approval:
UFO -- does the UFO identify the most likely problems customers will see and identify how the feature will enable them to diagnose and solve those problems without resorting to raising a PMR? Have these issues been addressed in the implementation?
Test and Demo -- As part of the serviceability process we're asking feature teams to test and analyze common problem paths for serviceability and demo those problem paths to someone not involved in the development of the feature (eg. IBM Support, test team, or another development team).
a) What problem paths were tested and demonstrated?
b) Who did you demo to?
c) Do the people you demo'd to agree that the serviceability of the demonstrated problem scenarios is sufficient to avoid PMRs for any problems customers are likely to encounter, or that IBM Support should be able to quickly address those problems without need to engage SMEs?
SVT -- SVT team is often the first team to try new features and often encounters problems setting up and using them. Note that we're not expecting SVT to do full serviceability testing -- just to sign-off on the serviceability of the problem paths they encountered. a) Who conducted SVT tests for this feature? b) Do they agree that the serviceability of the problems they encountered is sufficient to avoid PMRs, or that IBM Support should be able to quickly address those problems without need to engage SMEs?
Which IBM Support / SME queues will handle PMRs for this feature? Ensure they are present in the contact reference file and in the queue contact summary, and that the respective IBM Support/SME teams know they are supporting it. Ask Don Bourne if you need links or more info.
Does this feature add any new metrics or emit any new JSON events? If yes, have you updated the JMX metrics reference list / Metrics reference list / JSON log events reference list in the Open Liberty docs?
@OpenLiberty/serviceability-approvers
UFO -- does the UFO identify the most likely problems customers will see and identify how the feature will enable them to diagnose and solve those problems without resorting to raising a PMR? Have these issues been addressed in the implementation?
Yes
Test and Demo -- As part of the serviceability process we're asking feature teams to test and analyze common problem paths for serviceability and demo those problem paths to someone not involved in the development of the feature (eg. IBM Support, test team, or another development team). a) What problem paths were tested and demonstrated? b) Who did you demo to? c) Do the people you demo'd to agree that the serviceability of the demonstrated problem scenarios is sufficient to avoid PMRs for any problems customers are likely to encounter, or that IBM Support should be able to quickly address those problems without need to engage SMEs?
a) There are no new errors coming from this feature. If there are network issue connecting to Maven repository with/without proxy, featureUtility will print appropriate error messages. b) EOI meeting/ Install team c) Yes
SVT -- SVT team is often the first team to try new features and often encounters problems setting up and using them. Note that we're not expecting SVT to do full serviceability testing -- just to sign-off on the serviceability of the problem paths they encountered.
SVT not required
Which IBM Support / SME queues will handle PMRs for this feature? Ensure they are present in the contact reference file and in the queue contact summary, and that the respective IBM Support/SME teams know they are supporting it. Ask Don Bourne if you need links or more info.
WAS: L3 Liberty Install
Does this feature add any new metrics or emit any new JSON events? If yes, have you updated the JMX metrics reference list / Metrics reference list / JSON log events reference list in the Open Liberty docs?
There are no new errors coming from this feature
@OpenLiberty/ste-approvers slide uploaded to STE-archive
David is going to complete the doc for the feature. The doc issue is at https://github.com/OpenLiberty/docs/issues/7442. Approving the feature.
Description
FeatureUtility can connect to Maven repository using proxy. However, users may not want to use proxy for some Maven repository even when they configured proxy settings. Common use case would be when they want connect to internal repository that doesn't require proxy.
We had a customer who requested this feature.
FeatureUtility should allow users to set proxy exclusion list. Although there is no specification for proxy exclusion list,
no_proxy
environment variable is the most standard way to specify it. Java useshttp.nonProxyHosts
system properties.Therefore, featureUtility could check proxy exclusion list using both ways:
1) Using
no_proxy
environment variable 2) Usinghttp.nonProxyHosts
jvm property infeatureUtility.properties
file.Documents
When available, add links to required feature documents. Use "N/A" to mark particular documents which are not required by the feature.
Externally raised requests for enhancements:
Aha idea
Requested feature
UFO: UFO link
FTS: Feature Test Summary GH Issue
Beta Blog: Link to Beta Blog Post GH Issue
GA Blog: Link to GA Blog Post GH Issue
Process Overview
Prioritization
Design
Implementation
Legal and Translation
Beta
GA
Other Deliverables
General Instructions
The process steps occur roughly in the order as presented. Process steps occasionally overlap.
Each process step has a number of tasks which must be completed or must be marked as not applicable ("N/A").
Unless otherwise indicated, the tasks are the responsibility of the Feature Owner or a Delegate of the Feature Owner.
If you need assistance, reach out to the OpenLiberty/release-architect.
Important: Labels are used to trigger particular steps and must be added as indicated.
Prioritization (Complete Before Development Starts)
The (OpenLiberty/chief-architect) and area leads are responsible for prioritizing the features and determining which features are being actively worked on.
Prioritization
[x] Feature added to the "New" column of the Open Liberty project board
[x] Priority assigned
Design (Complete Before Development Starts)
Design preliminaries determine whether a formal design, which will be provided by an Upcoming Feature Overview (UFO) document, must be created and reviewed. A formal design is required if the feature requires any of the following: UI, Serviceability, SVT, Performance testing, or non-trivial documentation/ID. Furthermore, each identified item places a blocking requirement on another team so it must be identified early in the process. The feature owner may check-off the item if they know it doesn't apply, but otherwise they should work with the focal point to determine what work, if any, will be necessary and make them aware of it.
Design Preliminaries
ID Required
, if non-trivial documentation needs to be created by the ID team.ID Required - Trivial
, if no design will be performed and only trivial ID updates are needed.Design
Design Review Request
Design Approval Request
Design Approved
No Design
No Design Approval Request
No Design Approved
Product Management Approval Request
and notifies OpenLiberty/product-managementProduct Management Approved
(OpenLiberty/product-management)FAT Documentation
[x] "Feature Test Summary" child task created
Implementation
A feature must be prioritized before any implementation work may begin to be delivered (inaccessible/no-ship). However, a design focused approach should still be applied to features, and developers should think about the feature design prior to writing and delivering any code.
Besides being prioritized, a feature must also be socialized (or No Design Approved) before any beta code may be delivered. All new Liberty content must be inaccessible in our GA releases until it is Feature Complete by either marking it
kind=noship
or beta fencing it.Code may not GA until this feature has obtained the
Design Approved
orNo Design Approved
label, along with all other tasks outlined in the GA section.Feature Development Begins
In Progress
labelLegal and Translation
In order to avoid last minute blockers and significant disruptions to the feature, the legal items need to be done as early in the feature process as possible, either in design or as early into the development as possible. Similarly, translation is to be done concurrently with development. Both MUST be completed before Beta or GA is requested.
Legal (Complete before Feature Complete Date)
Innovation (Complete 1 week before Feature Complete Date)
Translation (Complete by Feature Complete Date)
[ ] PII (Program Integrated Information) updates are merged (i.e. all English strings due for translation have been delivered), or N/A.
Beta
In order to facilitate early feedback from users, all new features and functionality should first be released as part of a beta release.
Beta Code
kind=beta
,ibm:beta
,ProductInfo.getBetaEdition()
target:beta
and the appropriatetarget:YY00X-beta
(where YY00X is the targeted beta version).release:YY00X-beta
(where YY00X is the first beta version that included the functionality).Beta Blog (Complete by beta eGA)
[ ] Beta blog issue created and populated using the Open Liberty BETA blog post template.
GA
A feature is ready to GA after it is Feature Complete and has obtained all necessary Focal Point Approvals.
Feature Complete
Translation - Complete
orTranslation - Missing
labelrelease
branch, feature owner adds labelTranslation - Complete
.Translation - Missing
.Translation - Missing
label is replaced withTranslation - Complete
.Translation - Blocked
label.Translation - Blocked
may NOT proceed to GA until the label has been replaced with eitherTranslation - Missing
orTranslation - Complete
.target:ga
and the appropriatetarget:YY00X
(where YY00X is the targeted GA version).Focal Point Approvals (Complete by Feature Complete Date)
These occur only after GA of this feature is requested (by adding a
target:ga
label). GA of this feature may not occur until all approvals are obtained.All Features
focalApproved:externals
@OpenLiberty/demo-approvers Demo scheduled for EOI [Iteration Number]
to this issue.focalApproved:demo
.focalApproved:fat
.Design Approved Features
focalApproved:id
.focalApproved:instantOn
.focalApproved:performance
.focalApproved:sve
.focalApproved:ste
.focalApproved:svt
.Remove Beta Fencing (Complete by Feature Complete Date)
GA Blog (Complete by Friday after GM)
Post GM (Complete before GA)
Post GA
[ ] Remove the
target:ga
andtarget:YY00X
labels, and add the appropriaterelease:YY00X
. (OpenLiberty/release-manager)Other Deliverables
[ ] Standalone Feature Blog Post - A blog post specifically about your feature or N/A. (Feature owner and OpenLiberty/release-architect)
[ ] OL Guides - OL Guides assessment is complete or N/A. (OpenLiberty/guide-assessment)
[ ] Dev Experience - Developer Experience & Tools work is complete or N/A. (OpenLiberty/dev-experience-assessment)