Closed rsherget closed 2 weeks ago
Please code review feature-related files, @OpenLiberty/delivery-approvers
Your personal build request is at https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_MZ8T0BIqEe-GLt3IcvbSMw
Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.
Your personal pipeline request is at https://libh-proxy1.fyre.ibm.com/cognitive/pipelineAnalysis.html?uuid=1cf84a07-8340-48ef-afb5-782279585ccf
Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.
The build rsherget-28427-20240514-1351 https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_MZ8T0BIqEe-GLt3IcvbSMw completed and has errors or failures.
For help analyzing your personal build, go to https://libh-proxy1.fyre.ibm.com/cognitive/buildAnalysis.html?uuid=_MZ8T0BIqEe-GLt3IcvbSMw
Please code review feature-related files, @OpenLiberty/delivery-approvers
Your personal build request is at https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_k1GCgBOHEe-GLt3IcvbSMw
Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.
Your personal pipeline request is at https://libh-proxy1.fyre.ibm.com/cognitive/pipelineAnalysis.html?uuid=25b3eb8e-5da0-46ae-9924-65425a278a91
Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.
The build rsherget-28427-20240516-0733 https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_k1GCgBOHEe-GLt3IcvbSMw completed and has errors or failures.
For help analyzing your personal build, go to https://libh-proxy1.fyre.ibm.com/cognitive/buildAnalysis.html?uuid=_k1GCgBOHEe-GLt3IcvbSMw
DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
356 product code files were changed.
Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.
5 infrastructure code files were changed.
4 test infrastructure code files were changed.
65 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.
66 NLS files were changed and need an ID review.
@OpenLiberty/message-reviewer Please review.
Just to make sure... there are a dozen new private ga features like "io.openliberty.internal.mpVersion-1.0". this is intended? Or should they also be marked no-ship?
This is intended. These features are brought in by mpCompatible features, which are already marked ga, so mpVersion features also must be ga. There is no difference in resolution of existing features when these features are introduced.
Only one build fat test error and it is unrelated to these changes, merging
OpenLiberty Pull Requester,
ATTENTION, READ THIS: Updated 4/11/2018 - Read and understand this completely, then delete this entire template. If a reviewer or merger sees this template, they should fail the review or merge.
If this code change is fixing a user-visible bug in previously released code, it MUST have an associated issue mentioned in the PR text or description. That Issue also MUST be labelled “release bug”
This directs automation to scrape this fix for inclusion in the next release's list of bugs fixed.
If this code is NOT for fixing a released bug, for example new function, fixing a bug in unreleased function, or other improvements that do not affect the user-space, no label is needed. An issue could or could not be used based on the developer’s discretion, but do still delete this text block.
For full details, please see this wiki page:
https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/wiki/Open-Liberty-Conventions