Closed marcelolynch closed 4 years ago
Not sure if this merits a PR or if raising an issue is more appropriate.
I also notice that this definition is sort of irrelevant? The formula $\phi$ and sets $\overline{c}$ are not used in the Theorem, and indeed there is an additional explanation for "parameters" a little bit later which doesn't use the notation. I would argue for removing everything after "for every set X" (including the footnote)
I endorse the change - looking at the version I have on my machine, I didn't use vector notation there, and didn't have the footnote; I guess someone else added it? Or maybe I lost track of things.
Great thanks to both of you!
It seems that the line was supposed to be commented (if you check line 17 before my last commit, it ends with % for
). I tracked other uses of the "vector notation" and it is safe to delete it here (the notation is defined again and used in section 12.5).
Fixes a small typo in a footnote defining "vector" notation for parameters in a formula