I think that the last paragraph (and possibly the tableau itself; see below) in the example within tableaux/identity.tex needs to be rewritten. That is the paragraph that explains the tableau for proving that equality is transitive.
The reason I find this paragraph confusing is because the terms t_1 and t_2 used in this tableau do not line up with the ones used in the =T inference rule. Namely, in this example, t_2 (resp. t_3) plays the role of t_1 (resp. t_2) in the rule. So when, reading the current text, it is not clear whether the terms in the text refer to those in the rule or those in the tableau. Rewriting the tableau with t' through t''' instead t_1 through t_3 would be one way to solve this issue.
I think that the last paragraph (and possibly the tableau itself; see below) in the example within tableaux/identity.tex needs to be rewritten. That is the paragraph that explains the tableau for proving that equality is transitive.
The reason I find this paragraph confusing is because the terms t_1 and t_2 used in this tableau do not line up with the ones used in the =T inference rule. Namely, in this example, t_2 (resp. t_3) plays the role of t_1 (resp. t_2) in the rule. So when, reading the current text, it is not clear whether the terms in the text refer to those in the rule or those in the tableau. Rewriting the tableau with t' through t''' instead t_1 through t_3 would be one way to solve this issue.