Closed greleigh closed 7 months ago
Um, we do need it for this example! (we could say c \times k < 1 instead of c < 1 \div k but I think that would make it less clear what's going on)
There is the issue that the interpretation of \div is not total. If kept, qualification of the “obvious interpretation” of \div is probably needed.
I’ve added a commit removing the remaining uses of \div in the example.
I've created an alternative pull request that tries to keep the intuitive quality of having division in the language but removing it from the official signature.
I don't have a strong preference between this and @greleigh's more minimal approach, but I think it should be changed to remove the division symbol from the official signature.
I think I like this a bit better than @beastaugh 's proposal since it avoids introducing a definition. But I thought it could stand to have a tiny bit of explanation of how it works (ie pointing out that r < 1/k iff rk < 1). What do you think?
This looks good to me.
I agree
Thanks to both of you!
Removed \div from function symbols on rationals (it’s not total and not needed).