This PR contains the license to this repository.
I have noticed that PR #1 contains software code with an Eclipse Public License (EPL) v2.0.
My understanding is that EPL is not compatible with MIT; EPL is a weaker copyleft that cannot be incorporated into an MIT code. The other way around is possible, and MIT license could be incorporated into and EPL v2.0.
Could you please confirm that this is the case? If you have some questions we could ask Linux Foundation (LF) Legal support, but remember that LF cannot provide advice.
This PR contains the license to this repository. I have noticed that PR #1 contains software code with an Eclipse Public License (EPL) v2.0. My understanding is that EPL is not compatible with MIT; EPL is a weaker copyleft that cannot be incorporated into an MIT code. The other way around is possible, and MIT license could be incorporated into and EPL v2.0.
Could you please confirm that this is the case? If you have some questions we could ask Linux Foundation (LF) Legal support, but remember that LF cannot provide advice.