Due to automatic padding for memory alignment, it is safer to copy this way.
Will do some more benchmarking to determine if there is a faster solution (new timer code does a lot of swaps) but this is still significantly faster than the linked-list implementation.
Due to automatic padding for memory alignment, it is safer to copy this way.
Will do some more benchmarking to determine if there is a faster solution (new timer code does a lot of swaps) but this is still significantly faster than the linked-list implementation.