Open rfranke opened 3 years ago
@rfranke is this a regression or was it always like that?
I assume that there is something wrong with the test setup. Just discovered that these two examples are working in OMEdit and are also reported as success for daily MSL 3.2.3 tests. One of them, Modelica.Electrical.Spice3.Examples.Oscillator
, is also reported as success for daily MSL 4.0.0 tests.
@sjoelund would you mind having a look?
Here is one more example that is reported as simulation error for PowerSystems_cpp
even though it works :
PowerSystems.Examples.AC3ph.Generation.Islanding
Yet another example: Modelica.Electrical.Analog.Examples.AmplifierWithOpAmpDetailed
verifies since yesterday, but is still reported with the same wrong results as before, see
https://github.com/OpenModelica/OpenModelica/commit/5ae02bbd5fdbbd07418c56862207cffc1f7846ce#diff-eb8d9f8a258b1410ea4631cd9647a54ee1e62ee6ccd11f60b11d840567024328
From current library tests:
In OMEdit:
The nightly tests report simulation errors for these two examples:
See https://libraries.openmodelica.org/branches/master/Modelica_trunk_cpp/Modelica_trunk_cpp.html
The examples appear to simulate though and
Oscillator
should not take that long. The examples do also work with MSL 3.2.3.Edit: the two examples do also fail for
Modelica_trunk
.What is wrong?