Command for non-secure build is mbed compile -m NUMAKER_PFM_M2351_NS -t ARMC6, should we communicate users to use NUMAKER_PFM_M2351 as default?
Background : Green tea test will fail with NUMAKER_PFM_M2351_NS unless --mock option is used with mbedls for target name.
Since target name by default is NUMAKER_PFM_M2351 and that is for non-secure builds, shall we communicate the same in all documentation and avoid using _NS for target?
NUMAKER_PFM_M2351 is implicit non-secure target, so we define NUMAKER_PFM_M2351_NS.
However to avoid confusion with Green tea test, it's OK to avoid _NS in documentation.
Command for non-secure build is
mbed compile -m NUMAKER_PFM_M2351_NS -t ARMC6
, should we communicate users to useNUMAKER_PFM_M2351
as default?Background : Green tea test will fail with
NUMAKER_PFM_M2351_NS
unless --mock option is used with mbedls for target name.Since target name by default is
NUMAKER_PFM_M2351
and that is for non-secure builds, shall we communicate the same in all documentation and avoid using _NS for target?