Business rules needs to have a usage

[RikardLarsson-BEAst]

All business rules needs to have a context. Example that has a usage: https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/qa/rules/PEPPOL-T120-R002/

Example that does not have a context: https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/qa/rules/PEPPOL-T124-R001/

The usage is given by adding a reference to the rule, e.g. <cbc:CustomizationID>urn:fdc:peppol.eu:logistics:trns:advanced_despatch_advice:1<?Rule PEPPOL-T120-R011?></cbc:CustomizationID>

If the rules has no usage it is difficult to develop by reading the syntax specification

[JorgenErlandsson]

Also would like to add that this pointer should be to the correct message. In example below there is a link between rule for T120 and Waybill.

PEPPOL-T120-R013 Message EndTime cannot be specified without StartTime

Context cac:EstimatedDeliveryPeriod Test not(cbc:EndTime) or (cbc:EndTime) and (cbc:StartTime) Usage / ubl:DespatchAdvice / cac:Shipment / cac:Delivery / cac:EstimatedDeliveryPeriod / cbc:StartTime / ubl:DespatchAdvice / cac:Shipment / cac:Delivery / cac:EstimatedDeliveryPeriod / cbc:EndTime / ubl:Waybill / cac:Shipment / cac:Delivery / cac:EstimatedDeliveryPeriod / cbc:StartTime / ubl:Waybill / cac:Shipment / cac:Delivery / cac:EstimatedDeliveryPeriod / cbc:EndTime / ubl:Waybill / cac:Shipment / cac:Delivery / cac:Despatch / cac:EstimatedDespatchPeriod / cbc:StartTime / ubl:Waybill / cac:Shipment / cac:Delivery / cac:Despatch / cac:EstimatedDespatchPeriod / cbc:EndTime

[agrindst]

Closed, completed