search

OpenPEPPOL / logistics-bis

3 stars 0 forks source link

Consider cardinality of Certificate type code #64

Closed PeterLBorresen closed 1 year ago

PeterLBorresen commented 1 year ago

In Despatch Advice Certificate, both certificate type code and certificate type are mandatory. A normal way would be to say that they both are optional, but apply a business rule saying that one of them has to be specified.

JorgenErlandsson commented 1 year ago

This is not possible to do since in UBL 2.2 both elements are mandatory. This will have to wait until we base the DespatchAdvice on a later UBL version.. Suggest to close this issue.

PeterLBorresen commented 1 year ago

Yes, but we are using UBL 2.3, where this has been corrected, see http://www.datypic.com/sc/ubl23/e-cac_Certificate.html

agrindst commented 1 year ago

In the PG meeting on 15 February, the WG suggested using UBL 2.3. There were no rejections of this proposal.

https://github.com/OpenPEPPOL/logistics-bis/issues/18

agrindst commented 1 year ago

Suggestion: for WP # 1, 2, 3 and 4 using UBL 2.3

for WP #0: Weight statement: UBL 2.3

Despatched Advice: Keep 2.1 until the UBL 2.4 is published. Then update to UBL 2.4

agrindst commented 1 year ago

Decided to not make any changes

agrindst commented 1 year ago

Will be reviewed when UBL 2.4 is released