As a Developer, I'd like it if there was more consistency and/or documentation around when methods in the framework are named Native_OnX, BP_OnX, or OnX so that I know what to expect when I call these methods and can adhere to the convention in newer code.
Background Information
I believe these prefixes were adopted to avoid clashing with delegate events named OnX (e.g., OnCharacterAdded). This may no longer be necessary now that we have implemented the event emitter pattern for delegates, since the delegate properties now live in separate concrete UClasses.
Native_OnX (e.g., Native_OnCharacterAdded) is always used for the native implementation of an event, while BP_OnX (e.g., BP_OnCharacterAdded) is always used for a BlueprintImplementable or BlueprintNative event.
Given the above, I believe that in C++ code, native components tend to notify each other via Native_OnX calls that then dispatch calls to the BP_OnX variant.
As a Developer, I'd like it if there was more consistency and/or documentation around when methods in the framework are named
Native_OnX,BP_OnX, orOnXso that I know what to expect when I call these methods and can adhere to the convention in newer code.Background Information
OnX(e.g.,OnCharacterAdded). This may no longer be necessary now that we have implemented the event emitter pattern for delegates, since the delegate properties now live in separate concrete UClasses.Native_OnX(e.g.,Native_OnCharacterAdded) is always used for the native implementation of an event, whileBP_OnX(e.g.,BP_OnCharacterAdded) is always used for aBlueprintImplementableorBlueprintNativeevent.Native_OnXcalls that then dispatch calls to theBP_OnXvariant.