search

OpenPTrack / open_ptrack_v2

OPT v2 "Gnocchi" - adding object tracking and pose recognition
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
220 stars 65 forks source link

Frame rate too low #123

Open muella91 opened 4 years ago

muella91 commented 4 years ago

Hello,

I just realized that my sampling rate with which I receive pose tracking data is too low. Right now its around 10-13 Hz. Currently I am using single-camera pose tracking. My system got a NVIDIA Quadro P600, so I guess the GPU should not be the problem. I already checked the publishing rate at ~/open_ptrack_docker_config/single_camera_tracking/open_ptrack_config/tracking/conf/moving_average_filter.yaml , which is set to 30.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 384.130                Driver Version: 384.130                   |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  Quadro P6000        Off  | 00000000:21:00.0  On |                  Off |
| 44%   75C    P0   119W / 250W |   2473MiB / 24435MiB |     88%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
|  GPU       PID   Type   Process name                             Usage      |
|=============================================================================|
|    0      1332      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                           423MiB |
|    0      3315      G   compiz                                       137MiB |
|    0     12332      G   /usr/lib/firefox/firefox                       3MiB |
|    0     13233      C   /opt/ros/kinetic/lib/nodelet/nodelet         555MiB |
|    0     13922      G   /opt/ros/kinetic/lib/rviz/rviz                73MiB |
|    0     14352      C   ...ace/ros/devel/lib/rtpose_wrapper/rtpose  1275MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

How can I fix this?

Thank you!

jburkeucla commented 4 years ago

Right now this is the expected performance for OpenPose. We are looking at acceleration options and incorporating newer vision of the libraries to see if we can improve performance. Just out of curiosity, what’s the CPU utilization?

From: Manuel Mueller notifications@github.com Reply-To: OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2 reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, February 14, 2020 at 9:09 AM To: OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2 open_ptrack_v2@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2] Frame rate too low (#123)

Hello,

I just realized that my sampling rate with which I receive pose tracking data is too low. Right now its around 10-13 Hz. Currently I am using single-camera pose tracking. My system got a NVIDIA Quadro P600, so I guess the GPU should not be the problem. I already checked the publishing rate at ~/open_ptrack_docker_config/single_camera_tracking/open_ptrack_config/tracking/conf/moving_average_filter.yaml , which is set to 30.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| NVIDIA-SMI 384.130 Driver Version: 384.130 |

|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |

| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |

|===============================+======================+======================|

| 0 Quadro P6000 Off | 00000000:21:00.0 On | Off |

| 44% 75C P0 119W / 250W | 2473MiB / 24435MiB | 88% Default |

+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| Processes: GPU Memory |

| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |

|=============================================================================|

| 0 1332 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 423MiB |

| 0 3315 G compiz 137MiB |

| 0 12332 G /usr/lib/firefox/firefox 3MiB |

| 0 13233 C /opt/ros/kinetic/lib/nodelet/nodelet 555MiB |

| 0 13922 G /opt/ros/kinetic/lib/rviz/rviz 73MiB |

| 0 14352 C ...ace/ros/devel/lib/rtpose_wrapper/rtpose 1275MiB |

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

How can I fix this?

Thank you!

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2/issues/123?email_source=notifications&email_token=AADFGR24YNCENILHIO65YMDRC3F3DA5CNFSM4KVMFWGKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4INUDSAA, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADFGR5LWEIYC5LJNMRMFSDRC3F3DANCNFSM4KVMFWGA.

mnemllr commented 4 years ago

Okay, so I cannot get higher frame rates right now, even if I find a way to accelerate my GPU? The 30 FPS of OpenPTrack v1 is only valid for person track I guess?

This tracking data is delivered at 30 frames per second as a simple JSON-formatted stream via UDP, which can be incorporated easily into creative coding tools, such as Max/MSP, Touchdesigner, and Processing.

What do you guess, when will you be able to update OpenPTrack v2 with a newer version of OpenPose (months, years, ...)?

I will check the CPU utilization tomorrow.

Thank you!

bsubbaraman commented 4 years ago

Correct, OPTv1 only included person tracking, which is what the quote refers to. We have no definitive plans for updating to the newest OpenPose, but it is being tracked in open issue #48

mnemllr commented 4 years ago

Okay, thank you for your answer and your effort!

jburkeucla commented 4 years ago

Person tracking and object tracking in version 2 will also function at 30fps. It's just pose that doesn't

From: Manuel Mueller notifications@github.com Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2020 4:22:56 PM To: OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2 open_ptrack_v2@noreply.github.com Cc: Burke, Jeff jburke@remap.ucla.edu; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2] Frame rate too low (#123)

Okay, thank you for your answer and your effort!

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/OpenPTrack/open_ptrack_v2/issues/123?email_source=notifications&email_token=AADFGR6PS7F76ODI5EAK5B3RDGHBBA5CNFSM4KVMFWGKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEL4PXKY#issuecomment-586742699, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADFGRYHMILBCP2OCPRLJQTRDGHBBANCNFSM4KVMFWGA.