search

OpenRefine / openrefine.org

Source website for openrefine.org
https://openrefine.org
Other
133 stars 119 forks source link

Blog post to announce new advisory committee members #290

Closed wetneb closed 7 months ago

wetneb commented 7 months ago

@magdmartin I've slightly reformatted and added links to your text, let me know if it works for you

Also I have removed the slug in the header: those are not necessary for new blog posts, they were just there for older ones (to preserve URLs).

netlify[bot] commented 7 months ago

Deploy Preview for openrefine-website ready!

Name Link
Latest commit 3820597f5825efb4cb6f35363e70b85ef0ceaf2d
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/openrefine-website/deploys/65bd1b7767d6b100085a3eee
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-290--openrefine-website.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

wetneb commented 7 months ago

@magdmartin I would have reduced the resolution of those images as they are rather big. Sadly once the PR is merged, they are in the git repository "forever" unless we force-push to clean things up. It's something worth keeping in mind whenever you add images here.

tfmorris commented 7 months ago

I think it's still worth fixing. The second image takes several seconds to download in multiple chunks on my 100+ Mb/s connection. That's not a very good user experience.

p.s. Even force pushing them won't reduce the repository size. The repo history would need to be rewritten. pps Using consistent framing / aspect ratios for both photos would be a plus as well.

magdmartin commented 7 months ago

I apologize, I haven't considered the file size. If you can offer some advice on how to rewrite the repository, I've done some research and it appears to be quite complex with a potential risk of corrupting the repo. I don't feel confident enough to take action myself.

tfmorris commented 7 months ago

To clarify, I think it's worth replacing the image file with one of a smaller size and matching cropping, but I don't think it's worth rewriting the git history. The file is 4.5MB, not 100s of MB, and the repo is 23 MB on disk (vs 547 MB for the source code repo).

wetneb commented 7 months ago

I reduced the image sizes.