search

OpenScienceMOOC / Module-1-Open-Principles

Module 1: Open Principles
https://opensciencemooc.eu
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
37 stars 16 forks source link

mention ORCID-CrossRef integration before manual adding #9

Closed egonw closed 5 years ago

egonw commented 5 years ago

Because most people get most done with that integration, and it would be annoying to have added a few manually, and then a bit later read that you could have done it easier. Moreover, the integration auto-updates and manual adding/editing should really only be used for things which cannot be done automatically.

Solution: mention the integrations before the manual adding.

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

I think that is the case! See how it goes from Direct, to BibTeX, to Manual here: https://github.com/OpenScienceMOOC/Module-1-Open-Principles/blob/master/content_development/Task_2.md#populating-your-orcid-profile

Do you think it needs to be made more clear? @egonw

egonw commented 5 years ago

I see that now. I will see if I can make a suggestion to make it more to my liking :)

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

OK, great! Bear with one minute and let me push new changes to the doc @egonw :)

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

Hey @egonw, any thoughts on how to improve this for now? :)

alainna commented 5 years ago

I've been making some changes to a local version of the ORCID section, to include info about the Crossref and DataCite auto-updates, as well as add details about other systems that also include connections (e.g. INSPIRE, which has an auto-update and enables arXiv works to be added to records 🛩 )

hopefully will have this all ready for a pull this week 😺

let me know if any other ORCIDy things we could add in it 😉

egonw commented 5 years ago

Hi all, I'm sorry I did not have time yet... end of year chaos... too many deliverables and deadlines :( I'll check it as soon as possible and hope that that will be soon...

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

Thank you so much, @alainna, that sounds amazing! Really looking forward to seeing this. @egonw no worries either, no rush on this. Perhaps better to wait and see what @alainna has altered and then see how to build on top of that contribution if needed? :)

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

Hey @egonw any progress on this now we're in the new year? Would be great to get finalised before production :)

egonw commented 5 years ago

Ping received... it's on my schedule.

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

Perfect, dank je!

egonw commented 5 years ago

Sorry. Things are not going as planned (planning is impossible in my function, I've experimentally discovered). I'm closing this one.

Protohedgehog commented 5 years ago

OK, no worries @egonw, I think we have this pretty much covered anyway :)