Mathias
9:42 AM
Och för att komplettera den tanken. Egentligen tycker jag att Design Science rörelsen kanske är det viktigaste komplementet till naturvetenskapen. Det här skrev jag tidigare som not efter länkmötet:
From my angle I think that the most important "add-on" for cybersecurity/computer science as compared to natural sciences is that natural sciences essentially always boils down to building theory about how "the world works" whereas in computer science has a more multifaceted range of evaluation criteria. For instance in previous studies we have done we have compared how our security assessors (attack graph simulations) are performing as compared to human experts' security assessments of the same systems (rather than any actual attacks). This is (arguably) a valid research study. To me this is largely covered in people framing this was design science. But other than that it seems to me that relating the natural sciences to computer science is the main topic to adress.
Mathias 9:33 AM Här är ett tankeexperiment man skulle kunna göra något av: hur många av dessa metoder är rimliga att använda inom cybersäkerhet (och när)? :slightly_smiling_face: https://www.studentlitteratur.se/serier/greppbar-metod/ studentlitteratur.sestudentlitteratur.se Greppbar metod Greppbar metod är en serie metodböcker om olika sätt att bedriva forskning. Serien innehåller bland annat böcker om intervjuer, fokusgrupper och forskningsetik. (216 kB) https://www.studentlitteratur.se/serier/greppbar-metod/
Mathias 9:42 AM Och för att komplettera den tanken. Egentligen tycker jag att Design Science rörelsen kanske är det viktigaste komplementet till naturvetenskapen. Det här skrev jag tidigare som not efter länkmötet: From my angle I think that the most important "add-on" for cybersecurity/computer science as compared to natural sciences is that natural sciences essentially always boils down to building theory about how "the world works" whereas in computer science has a more multifaceted range of evaluation criteria. For instance in previous studies we have done we have compared how our security assessors (attack graph simulations) are performing as compared to human experts' security assessments of the same systems (rather than any actual attacks). This is (arguably) a valid research study. To me this is largely covered in people framing this was design science. But other than that it seems to me that relating the natural sciences to computer science is the main topic to adress.