Open cszyszka opened 6 years ago
Hi @cszyszka, at least the unit feet is already present (besides the metric units) in the "Unit" enum in TrafficSignValue. Inches may be added,
In #258, consolidated signs like Stvo 393 are added to the trafficsign.proto.
Nevertheless, as you proposed, a repeated value entry might be required for some of the above signs,
Changing the field from "optional" to "repeated" would be a mojor version change. But the PR #258 did solve the problem partially. I will keep this issue and postpone the milestone to 4.0.0.
Issue
In some cases we might need to represent multiple TrafficSignValue in TrafficSign This occurs in case there are multiple physical values on one TrafficSign.
My suggestion would be to change TrafficSign::MainSign::Classification::value to repeated field type. TheTrafficSign::SupplementarySign::Classification::value is already repeated.
Examples
Vertical clearance
OSI can not represent foots and inches
In addition to foots and inches we also have metric system.
Speed limit
Maybe this situation can be handled with multiple supplementary signs?