**This repository is abandoned and looking for a maintainer.** A tool to visualize OSI data from two different sources. Data can be stored in files and replayed afterwards, or validated using a Python interface.
Other
39
stars
25
forks
source link
Visualizer is not running as expected and looks differently #54
We at TU Darmstadt FZD try to get the visualizer running, but have no success.
Additionally, the README shows a button for FMU selection, which is not there in my current version. (I planned to select a OSMPNetworkProxy FMU there as receiver).
Describe what you have already tried
Actually, we have a tool providing data and sending it out via the OSMPNetworkProxy on 127.0.0.1 Port 3456.
I can connect to the port via nc -vv -l 127.0.0.1 3456 and see data there during simulation test runs (even if it is not readable).
Ask your question
So, can you support us getting the visualizer running and can you explain, why it is not showing the FMU option anymore?
Additional context
I had a phone call with @pmai already, but he suggested to ask the question here for better support.
I assigned @jdsika and @vkresch here, but probably @eknabevcc and @tbleher can support, as well?
Describe the problem
Hi!
We at TU Darmstadt FZD try to get the visualizer running, but have no success. Additionally, the README shows a button for FMU selection, which is not there in my current version. (I planned to select a OSMPNetworkProxy FMU there as receiver).
Describe what you have already tried
Actually, we have a tool providing data and sending it out via the OSMPNetworkProxy on 127.0.0.1 Port 3456. I can connect to the port via
nc -vv -l 127.0.0.1 3456
and see data there during simulation test runs (even if it is not readable).Ask your question
So, can you support us getting the visualizer running and can you explain, why it is not showing the FMU option anymore?
Additional context
I had a phone call with @pmai already, but he suggested to ask the question here for better support. I assigned @jdsika and @vkresch here, but probably @eknabevcc and @tbleher can support, as well?