Closed PrivatePuffin closed 3 years ago
I am very busy with the wireless project.
This is DIY project and so I think there are no advantages to implement such standard. Unless is must be implemented, I don't see it to be a priority in the developers lists.
But thanks for sharing this information. The more you can share, the more later someone can learn on this and maybe implement it.
Maybe this could be written to the wiki, as advice for the ones that want to configure the firmware in a way it follows most possible the standard.
I've read through EN:15194:2017 and I can not find any reason the current version doesn't comply with EN:15194:2017 already. As listed above, there are only a few area's where one might not qualify for EN:15194:2017:
- Voltage mods
- motors rated +250w.
- overspeeding
(which are mostly related to hardware choices or doing things that are obviously not a good idea anyway.)
Maybe this could be written to the wiki, as advice for the ones that want to configure the firmware in a way it follows most possible the standard.
Thats a great idea! 👍
Hello. I have emailed you about that. Thank you
It would be nice to vett the performance of this firmware for EN:15194 compliance, or at least enable users to do so by giving clear instructions. Mostly because the definitions for nominal rater power output are not put down in (european)-law, but put into the 100+ euro's costing EN:15194 standard.
If no one has access, i've a copy that might find it's way into your inbox by forwarding mistake somewhere these days.