Closed mpetrosian closed 1 year ago
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
main@8ceeeae
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #69 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 91.11%
=======================================
Files ? 39
Lines ? 3084
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 2810
Misses ? 274
Partials ? 0
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
And while you are at it, I think the input_factors
and output_factors
arguments should go from combine_subplots
.
Instead, tell the user to remove any subplots from model_dict
that she does not want to see included. Then pass in the model_dict
as well, looping over factors in the correct order. If some factor is not found in x / y, do not show that row.
There should be a possibility of including blank rows / columns, e.g. by leaving the key ("a", "b")
in model_dict
but setting the value to None
instead of a plot.
(the current approach does not allow for gaps, remember that my application features irregular factors across periods, some factors are not around in some periods).
Visualize transition functions and factor distributions using python's
plotly
library.