search

OpenSourceMalaria / pipeline_living_review

An open, living review of the current antimalarial pipeline
1 stars 0 forks source link

The First Overall Goal #1

Open mattodd opened 5 years ago

mattodd commented 5 years ago

This Issue is just to clarify the first overall goal. The original review is published. All the constituent files are available on this repository (click "code" above). To convert the review to a living review (updateable by anyone) will require the review to be ported to the wiki section of this repository as the first step.

This will need volunteers interested in contributing to such an effort. No doubt this task will require discussion here or in subsequent, separate issues as needs arise.

swapniljha001 commented 4 years ago

The goal is to copy the original published review to the wiki section while retaining its original format as much as possible?

edwintse commented 4 years ago

Hi @swapniljha001, yes the goal is to copy the text and figures into the relevant wiki pages. I think formatting is not the biggest issue. As long as all the text is there it should be fine.

swapniljha001 commented 4 years ago

Hi, @edwintse, I would like to contribute to this issue, but I don't have the edit rights, ~and I believe that Wiki cannot be forked and updated, unlike the code files.~ I learnt that one can indeed fork the Wiki.git but only on a local machine and not in the browser, it would be a lot more convenient if you can give me edit permissions so I can add wiki pages directly on the browser so that I'd be able to preview the changes before submitting them.

You do not have permission to update this wiki.

It will take a long time since it is a long research paper with lots of hyperlinks and citations, is there any particular deadline for this task?

mattodd commented 4 years ago

Hi Swapnil, It'd be great if you wanted to contribute in this way. I can just give you edit rights. Mat

On Mon., 7 Sep. 2020, 22:01 Swapnil Jha, notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi, @edwintse https://github.com/edwintse, I would like to contribute to this issue, but I don't have the edit rights, and I believe that Wiki cannot be forked and updated, unlike the code files.

You do not have permission to update this wiki.

It will take a long time since it is a long research paper with lots of hyperlinks and citations, is there any particular deadline for this task?

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMalaria/pipeline_living_review/issues/1#issuecomment-688509589, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBO2NLGVVMXQLQVSSRPHC3SEVCZBANCNFSM4HHWPOMA .

swapniljha001 commented 4 years ago

Thanks, @mattodd, it will surely make editing and previewing files easier for me. Give me a message, once I have the editing permissions, and I will start working on it.

kwanchristopher commented 4 years ago

I can also help out as needed.

@edwintse @mattodd For the "Past" section, I noticed there is an image for "5 examples of well-known antimalarial medicines discovered between 1820 and the 1980s". 5 subheadings have been created in the "Past" section; one for each of the medicines.

Would you like an additional "overview" page for this image as well as its accompanying description? Or would you prefer it if I added this image (and its description) at the beginning of each of the subheadings for the "Past" section?

kwanchristopher commented 4 years ago

Some of the in-text references on the original review links to references that are not online; can I also add a references section after the Conclusions section of the Wiki?

drc007 commented 4 years ago

@kwanchristopher @mattodd It might be useful to provide a link to the Wikipedia page for each drug mentioned e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipargamin

and give PubChem reference https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/44469321

and ChEMBL reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/compound_report_card/CHEMBL1082723/

and include InChiKey?

CKLPLPZSUQEDRT-WPCRTTGESA-N

mattodd commented 4 years ago

Nice ideas @drc007 since that leverages the advantage of the whole thing being online, yes. @kwanchristopher thanks for your offer of help, that'd be greatly appreciated. Overview section makes sense if that means we use the image once. @swapniljha001 I'll give you edit privileges now.

swapniljha001 commented 4 years ago

Currently working on -

kwanchristopher commented 4 years ago

Quick update; text for all the sections have now been added and referenced. Working on adding figures to all the sections.

kwanchristopher commented 4 years ago

Figures have all been added, just need to link wikipedia pages, PubChem/ChEMBL/InChiKey reference to each drug mentioned in article.

The "Author Contributions" section already includes both the "Acknowledgements" and "Competing Interests" sections, so I have removed the latter two from the side bar. If this is a mistake, please let me know.

swapniljha001 commented 4 years ago

I have added, formatted and proofread the texts wherever necessary, and now this version of the study is on par if not more updated than the original article. After addition of PubChem/ChEMBL/InChiKey by @kwanchristopher , this issue can be closed.