Open MFernflower opened 9 months ago
Thanks @mattodd and @MFernflower - is there any action you need from us (Ersilia)? @meh-cyprian please let us know if you need anything from us at this stage. As you know, a ligand-centred model was built and is readily available.
@wwjvdsande Because sporotrichosis was mentioned and @MFernflower suggested the DNDi compound fosravuconazole for testing, there are two papers dealing with ravuconazole (see links). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01701.x https://academic.oup.com/mmy/article/46/2/141/1040643
From what I can gather from those papers it seems like the DNDi azole will work on sporothrix - I geuss it would be just a matter of asking DNDi if they could set up a clinical trial for there mycetoma drug in Brazil for sporothrix?
@MFernflower Maybe @dosreic can provide some information about the future plans of DNDi with fosravuconazole and the chances of a possible trial with Brazilian sporotrichosis patients.
https://dndi.org/our-people/borna-nyaoke/ seems to be the clinical trial director for fosravuconazole
maybe @wwjvdsande can get the sporothrix researcher (I forgot her name) in contact?
@wwjvdsande @MA-Jjingyi Our naphthazarin paper was cited by a review about Galleria mellonella now (see link). https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/13/3/233
@MFernflower @wwjvdsande @MA-Jjingyi Our new sporotrichosis partners in Brazil have recently published a paper about niclosamide (see link). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42770-024-01301-5
Time: Feb 27th (12 noon UK) Timezones.
The Outlook invite can be found here
Location: https://uni-sydney.zoom.us/j/99281549497. In case of failure, use https://ucl.zoom.us/j/99789829423 and in case of double failure use MycetOS meeting teams link
Chair: USyd Minute taker: UCL Previous meeting: https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/15 and minutes. Recording: here Present: Apologies:
AGENDA
@OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib please flag up any key issues ahead of the meeting, and please note any apologies above.
In vitro screening**
Series 1 - Fenarimols
[ ] Final Molecules/SAR Gaps (summarised here. Latest status was described in previous meeting (#14). @fantasy121 has added a new SAR diagram, also to the paper.
[ ] @dosreic to investigate whether it is possible to have SCYX0001294212 EPL-BS0121 and SCYX0001315839 EPL-BS0143 shipped from TCG to Wendy.
[x] @fantasy121 has added the five compounds tested to the Master List and generated MyOS codes and sent those codes to @MA-Jjingyi and/or @marijschippers to ensure data can be properly reported. Shown here. Have they been reported?
[ ] @MA-Jjingyi to advise whether more data coming on these compounds
Fenarimol Paper
Most recent file version on Dropbox is: Fenarimol Paper January 29 V2.3 edited last Feb 11th 2024.
Highlighting recent hits in this series: from @MA-Jjingyi latest data, it would be helpful to have a diagram with structures. MYOS00510 and MYOS00518 were hits? Do recently-tested compounds need to be incorporated in the fenarimol manuscript? New SAR diagrams ideally need to be added to the wiki with codes, or we risk missing key insights from the new data.
Examples (are there others?): Data from Sept 21
[ ] Modelling: @meh-cyprian to proceed to try to model fenarimol compounds in potential protein target (described here or to clarify what more data are needed. Aim is to better understand the SAR via docking vs homology model of protein. @gemmaturon and @miquelduranfrigola presented their work that was done when visiting @meh-cyprian.
Siderophores:
Fluoroscent siderophore was tested in the larvae in the last weeks of the season.
Series 2 - Aminothiazoles
Molecules made by UCL MSc cohort (23 entries) were shipped to Erasmus MC for testing. Data were summarised by @eloizidou here. Also Whitgift compound (MYOS_0590_00_01). There were some slightly confusing data: some duplicate compounds have had different results when tested twice. What to do? Generally, compounds not very active. Next steps potentially double halogenation on right hand ring?
What is the mechanism of action related to this chemotype in the literature? Should we try testing with itraconazole to see if there is a synergistic effect – if there is, at least we’ll know that the aminothioazoles have a different MOA (i.e. do not work by inhibiting CYP451)
@KlementineJBS wrote a guide on the Wiki on how to share compounds in a way that will hopefully prevent duplication of both compounds themselves and MYOS codes. Also posted some compounds to be made next here.
Series 5 - Benzimidazoles Good potencies were observed for recent compound batches of benzoxazoles (e.g. here). These resemble the benzimidazoles which have shown potent in vivo efficacy.
Testing is ongoing. So far MYOS00527 was the only hit. @AndreaOtago conveyed here that the data are now public domain. <-- any learnings? Three of the compounds, UO17, UO22 and UO24, are eligible for in vivo screening later in the year?
Some oxazoles will be tested against Falciformispora senegalensis too (by whom?). This series will be evaluated in vivo in the new larval season <-- is this still to be done?
More benzoxazoles: @AndreaOtago says that the CHEM 305 students will be making more benzoxazoles in April 2024 as part of their lab project. @dosreic suggested doing some PK 'SAR' follow up analogues so this could inform both DNDi's project and this project. @dosreic to follow up the DMPK results.
Would still be useful to know whether additional samples could be obtained from other labs.
Series 6: ketoximes
Latest compound shipment https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-6-Ketoximes/issues/5, to be tested by @MA-Jjingyi.
Commercial oxiconazole nitrate (Z isomer) most potent so far. Compound MYOS00419 has not been tested - @wwjvdsande to check on this
@bebi78 had suggested evaluating different salts of the ketoximes, still of value for future. Perhaps this can go on the wiki under future plans? <-- outdated. Would be useful to capture on wiki and then delete from here.
Series 3: Tricyclics/Phenothiazines
**Global Health Priority Box***
This has been tested and reported by @MA-Jjingyi here. Three compounds were taken on to in vivo testing. Outcome is some promise for compound MMV1804559, the structure of which is shown here. This compound both prolonged larval survival and induced morphological changes in the grains (decreasing their size).
Kinase inhibitor library.
The KCGS library was screened. Additional drugs of similar classes were sent by @bebi78 and screened by @marijschippers. In total 6 drugs from the KCGS appeared to be hits along with one from the package sent by @bebi78.
Bioinformatics
Plant Extracts from Nigeria
Further to the conversation here we need to establish
[ ] Whether the extracts have been evaluated @wwjvdsande @MA-Jjingyi
[ ] How we assign codes to these samples @bebi78
[ ] Whether more samples are incoming and how we can obtain costs for shipment @nwezemeka @dosreic
Misc updates:
[x] Jan 30th is World NTD Day - how should we mark this to spread the word? Amplification of socmed activity by @dosreic would be very good. Can be closed - activity was noted here, so this can be removed.
[ ] @mattodd has received DMPK measurements by Dundee. Compound selection took place in here - @dmitrij176 to post there the chemdraw and spreadsheet of the final list of compounds that was sent to Dundee so we can correlate data with structure.
[x] @KlementineJBS to enter the data for Rohan Davies' compounds into the Master List. They need MyOS codes. <-- done? Can this be closed?
[x] @MA-Jjingyi previously presented larval toxicity studies results from recent compound screening. Data were presented here, but how do we fold the data into the Master List and the various wikis? @KlementineJBS gave a summary here. Do we have a strategy for toxicity measurements more generally?
Notes on screening methods
Next Meetings
March 26th 8 a.m. UK time (Timezones)