OpenSourceMycetoma / Monthly-zoom-meetings

Since MycetOS is diversifying we decided as from 2023 to place the monthly meetings no longer under a compound series but separately in this repository.
1 stars 0 forks source link

Monthly MycetOS meeting - 25 June 2024 #23

Open mattodd opened 5 months ago

mattodd commented 5 months ago

Time: June 25th (12 noon UK) (Timezones)

The Outlook invite can be found https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/2#issuecomment-1905476888

Location: https://uni-sydney.zoom.us/j/99281549497. In case of failure, use https://ucl.zoom.us/j/99789829423 and in case of double failure use MycetOS meeting teams link

Chair: UCL Minute taker: ErasmusMC Previous meeting: uploaded? Recording of today's meeting: Present: Apologies:

AGENDA AND MINUTES

Screening updates

Series 1 - Fenarimols

Paper update

Updated list of To Dos here.

The paper is almost ready to go. However, the NMR data needs to be sorted. Both @dmitrij176 and Hung finished their thesis and will submit soon. @mattodd will go through all the molecules one more to check if all the donations are acknowledgements

Modelling update

@meh-cyprian to proceed to try to model fenarimol compounds in potential protein target (described https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-1-Fenarimols/issues/68#issuecomment-1546869698 or to clarify what more data are needed. Aim is to better understand the SAR via docking vs homology model of protein. @osmanwa also interested in this area, has been in touch with @wwjvdsande and @mattodd by email, and can report back.

No activity in this area for a long time, so this section will be archived on the wiki and removed from meetings for now. Will be activated again when we find someone who is willing to do this.

Series 2 - Aminothiazoles

Not addressed directly

Series 3: Tricyclics/Phenothiazines

Series 5 - Benzimidazoles

Series 6: ketoximes

Other

Global Health Priority Box

Paper now published!

Kinase Inhibitor Library

Plant Extracts from Nigeria --> this issue is going to be archived.

Dundee DMPK Measurements

AOB

Sporotrichosis project

Toxicity column

Other

Next meeting

https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/24 SKIPPED DUE TO SUMMER HOLIDAY

MA-Jjingyi commented 5 months ago

Hi, three compounds from series 3, MYOS626, MYOS627 and MYOS628 were used up. and Marij finished her internship. If you want to test them in vivo model this summer, Please send them again. Then I will try to test them later.

MFernflower commented 5 months ago

@lferrins could more of these compounds be send to Wendy's lab for in-vivo screening in the caterpillar model?

LoriRequest

MFernflower commented 5 months ago

@eloizidou https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/wiki/Desirable-Compounds-Not-Yet-Synthesised

wwjvdsande commented 5 months ago

@OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib the next monthly meeting will be on 23 July, which is during the summer holidays in the Northern hemisphere. We wondered if there will be enough people going to attend the meeting. Could you put your name behind the question if you are attending yes or no [ ] Yes I will be attending: [ ] No I will not be attending: @wwjvdsande @KlementineJBS

wwjvdsande commented 5 months ago

@OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib I added the toxicity data and the extra columns in the spreadsheet

lferrins commented 4 months ago

@lferrins could more of these compounds be send to Wendy's lab for in-vivo screening in the caterpillar model?

LoriRequest

I can check on the availability of material - how much would you need?

MFernflower commented 4 months ago

@lferrins five milligrams is the number I remember but tagging @wwjvdsande to verify

MFernflower commented 4 months ago

@mattodd I remember you saying you were in the process of plating a library of compounds you group has made and would give them to another researcher - I have not been in contact with the Rice pathogenic amoeba research lab ( @MOUSEY007 ) for quite some time (after the fenarimol screen that gave negative results) but perhaps you could see if they would be interested in it?

https://vet.purdue.edu/discovery/rice/index.php

I think the TB ones would be the most intersting as one of these pathogenic amoeba (Balamuthia) has a thick cell wall somewhat like that of TB

MA-Jjingyi commented 4 months ago

@lferrins five milligrams is the number I remember but tagging @wwjvdsande to verify

Good morning, @lferrins. Yes, five milligrams are enough.

MFernflower commented 4 months ago

Hi all, I assume the meeting for July is cancelled due to summer vacation of the participating universities?

mattodd commented 4 months ago

Yes - let me add a note to the Issue list.

lferrins commented 3 months ago

@lferrins five milligrams is the number I remember but tagging @wwjvdsande to verify

Good morning, @lferrins. Yes, five milligrams are enough.

Thanks @MFernflower for finding this for me! @MA-Jjingyi we have found them but likely don't have 5mg of all of them. What is the minimum quantity that you need?

MFernflower commented 3 months ago

I just checked our "masterlist" -----> it seems like the original curaxin 137 was not sent in batch of compounds to Wendy??

@mattodd @lferrins @wwjvdsande

I feel like it would be rather important to screen pure curaxin 137 since this is now the main lead for series 3

lferrins commented 3 months ago

I will see if we can find it - however, we don't have to test that compound specifically. The derivative/s with the best activity and selectivity are ultimately the ones that we are most interested in!

MFernflower commented 3 months ago

You are indeed correct. However the current strategy is to try to scaffold hop away from the diacetylcarbazole to a tricyclic core with better metabolic stability ---> see https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-3-Phenothiazines/wiki/Desirable-Compounds-Not-Yet-Synthesised

So I feel like curaxin 137 should be screened so we can use it as a baseline to compare the scaffold hops too

@lferrins

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 8:24 PM Lori Ferrins @.***> wrote:

I will see if we can find it - however, we don't have to test that compound specifically. The derivative/s with the best activity and selectivity are ultimately the ones that we are most interested in!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/23#issuecomment-2272392566, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYEWDSUF3OPIXEVGW5I7VLZQFSNHAVCNFSM6AAAAABJ2UTRT2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENZSGM4TENJWGY . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

MA-Jjingyi commented 3 months ago

@lferrins five milligrams is the number I remember but tagging @wwjvdsande to verify

Good morning, @lferrins. Yes, five milligrams are enough.

Thanks @MFernflower for finding this for me! @MA-Jjingyi we have found them but likely don't have 5mg of all of them. What is the minimum quantity that you need?

Hi @lferrins . As usual, 3-5 mg is enough. Recently in larvae model testing, MYOS631 and MYOS632 didn't prolong mm55 infected larvae survival.

just let you know that I will go back to China soon. maybe a new worker will test them for you later.

@OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib