Open mattodd opened 1 year ago
Unfortunately won't be attending the meeting today. I have created some slides on where I am at so far in synthesising the benzimidazole compounds: MycetOS July meeting.pptx
I am still work on synthesising the lead compound:
But I hope to start on some SAR very soon !
Unluckily, the Italy factory produced larvae is going through flood. then we tested larvae from 2 other brands. we only can start treatment after the quality of larvae must be verified. In the meantime, we hope the factory from Italy will be reproduced larvae soon. then we can work as usual.
Hi @memm0740 - that's great. Can you please share a link to the ELN? Important that raw data are available for each project. We can also add to the wiki under "Sources of Data".
For those who are late, join us in: https://ucl.zoom.us/j/99789829423
have any novel phenothiazines been made? @bebi78
if not - since many phenothiazines are well known - series 3 should NOT be sent for DMPK
@MFernflower No, but maybe @rohandavis has some suggestions from his compound list.
@dmitrij176 the whitgift compound is one we've already made so it doesn't need to be assigned a MYOS number. They've made a repeat in the first instance to get their head around the synthesis and make sure everything works.
@mattodd - the compound Sevenoaks was working on, has been synthesised and analysed? Please tag/share the schools meeting dets with me once you've organised.
Chair: UCL Minute taker: USyd Previous meeting: #6 Recording: [here] Present: Mat Todd, Jingyi Ma, Dmitrij Melechov, Wendy van de Sande, Bernhard, Tony Apologies: Hung Phat Duong, Marita Emmanuel
Final Molecules/SAR Gaps
[ ] @MA-Jjingyi to evaluate these latest fenarimols and post data to the Master List.
Ma has not been able to test latest fenarimols yet due to issues in obtaining larvae. Will be done as soon as these issues can be resolved.
[ ] @mattodd to email the finalised list to Epichem (was there a query about whether the relationship between Epichem and DNDi still existed?)
Still to be done
[x] @meh-cyprian to proceed to try to model fenarimol compounds in potential protein target here, or to clarify what more data are needed. Aim is to better understand the SAR via docking vs homology model of protein. Someone from this lab will join Mat’s lab in September – hopefully this makes it easier to get this done. Paper:
[ ] @dmitrij176 to upload offline copy of fenarimol lab notebook (all relevant experiments) to UCL respository and provide link (@fantasy121 is https://doi.org/10.25910/CS81-G976). @mattodd to assist with copying data over.
Mat will try to sort this out.
[x] @mattodd to review final version of manuscript. Please don't go through the manuscript till @mattodd is finished. After this is done, @MA-Jjingyi and @wwjvdsande will generate an Excel sheet from our current Master List displaying all data on the fenarimols tested.
_Mat has made various changes including to SAR and will send it back to Hung and Dmitrij to review changes and finish experimental. Also need to make it clearer – how do these results fit into existing knowledge? This will probably require a literature search.
[ ] Compounds in paper need to be numbered with abbreviated MYOS codes e.g. MYOS7. The cut-off for in vivo data is end of larva season 2022: In vitro data will continue to be collected in 2023 (In vivo data 2023 season might be added to later revisions of manuscript but don’t wait for this before submission)
New transcriptomic data from @wwjvdsande in the galleria grain model showed that siderophores are produced (https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/What-other-molecules-to-screen/issues/10). These siderophores might be used as a trojan horse to get molecules into the grain. Could we couple fenarimols to fungal-relevant siderophores may be to get them in? The idea of the siderophores was of interest and all partners agreed to consider whether this could be done at the different sites. There is also potential relevance to other series. We have previously discussed what molecules could be attached to siderophores to explore this idea – everyone is encouraged to share ideas in the original issue. (Please post a link if you have it!)
Wendy has been talking to Professor Doyle about using his fluorescent-labelled siderophores to show that siderophores can indeed enter the grain – i.e. proof of concept. If this goes well we can move towards coupling molecules of interest onto the siderophores. Details still to be discussed with Doyle. Mat is hopeful that if UCL can get a MALDI, it will allow us to visualise where molecules are located within the grain without needing to use fluorescent labelling.
UCL students have started making molecules – some will be ready this month, others later in the summer. This is organised by Erica.
Oxazoles: Good potencies observed for recent compound batches (e.g. https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-1-Fenarimols/issues/82#issuecomment-1325150305). Promising because they resembled the benzimidazoles which showed potent in vivo efficacy. Some oxazoles will be tested against Falciformispora senegalensis too. This series will be evaluated in vivo in the new larval season. ¬
Dmitrij has shared the figure of the compounds that have been shipped to ErasmusMC for testing. This can be found at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-6-Ketoximes/issues/5.
DMPK measurement offer from the Wellcome Centre Anti-Infectives Research (WCAIR) at the University of Dundee, which often hosts trainees from around the world and who could run some 1st tier in vitro DMPK assays for MycetOS compounds as part of the training set for these folks. They have one trainee coming this July for 3 months and they could start doing this, if of interest. A meeting was held on June 16th to discuss. @bebi78 has made suggestions at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/6#issuecomment-1600655716, and some earlier comments were at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/5#issuecomment-1538392028. Need 2-3 mg of highly pure compound – we will send 30-35 molecules, about 5 from each series. Ideally should send highly potent compounds, but also would be good to include slightly less potent compounds if they have higher predicted solubility. Ideally, the selection should be structurally diverse. Separate enantiomers should only be sent if they have highly different potencies. Everyone should discuss this offline and determine a list of compounds. Samples need to be ready/sent off by end of the month.
Everyone should add their suggested selection to this issue (insert link). Make sure to provide compound name, MYOS code, structure, SMILES and the reasoning behind the selection.
[ ] All to complete this list of compounds to send to Dundee for DMPK measurements by what deadline?
Rohan’s contributed compounds: 96 well plate received. To be screened. Data for these compounds here.
[ ] @KlementineJBS to ask @memm07040 to enter data from Rohan’s spreadsheet into Master list and provide MYOS codes.
Kinase inhibitor library. The updated KCGS library was ordered on 1st of May and has been shipped. Bio-informatical analyses have been carried out by Mickey. @bebi78 can send some 10 targets. Action on this?
Bioinformatics: Waleed requested information on which aspect of bioinformatics should be prioritised to work on first. @wwjvdsande corresponded offline with him. This will include a Phylogenetic tree to work out relationships of various species were identified as high priorities so that we can search the literature for closely related species to Mycetoma, and for the potential structures of the drug target, which would enable us to simulate our data/estimation/computational models. In the May meeting Tariq Ayub attended from the Qasim group (need Github userID!) who will advise on what can be done in terms of future contributions.
AOB
UCL Dmitrij has obtained a crystal structure for one of the Series 6 compounds. He’s also successfully separated E/Z isomers of the positive control – this could be an interesting choice for DMPK studies. Need to see if the two isomers have different potencies first. Would also be interesting to test different salts – Dmitrij can perhaps choose a potent analogue and try forming the salt.
Hi - we have a meeting scheduled today/tonight in the calendar but I remember we discussed maybe not having it today as it's so soon after our last meeting. What did the decision end up being?
Hi - the Breaking Good team (Alice, Klem and I) unfortunately won’t be joining todays meeting. See you all at the next meeting!
Hi @KlementineJBS @animarfavi OK, well in that case given that @wwjvdsande and @csuth22 and @AndreaOtago are also apologies, and given that we only really have one issue to discuss - which is the compound shipment to Dundee - we can skip the in-person meeting today and instead deal with things offline. I will post an updated agenda for the next meeting (Aug 29th - chair USyd) and I'll use the time to collate the various decisions on shipping in #8. Ping @OpenSourceMycetoma/corecontrib @dosreic
Hi @mattodd sorry I haven't been active, I have generated the homology model and need to go on with docking the Fenarimol compounds. To achieve this, I will need the following
Hi @meh-cyprian
The number of compounds that were successfully tested on the target protein: zero. All compounds are tested phenotypically (vs whole organism). The protein target is assumed, hence in part the need for this analysis.
The range of activity (highest and lowest). All compounds can be found in the Master List. Filter by "Series 1". You only want in vitro potencies, and you'd need to select a consistent number, e.g. IC50 or IC90. Contact @MA-Jjingyi for any further clarification. @wwjvdsande may also have a view.
Brief description of the assay. No protein binding or biochemical assay, only potency in vitro. Again, if you need details, @MA-Jjingyi can provide, but I suspect this is not super-relevant for you.
Hi @meh-cyprian did you do anything with the Master List of compound data in the last couple of days by any chance? We noticed that a load of data was deleted. It's been restored, I think.
https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/10#issuecomment-1666518911
If you had been editing the spreadsheet recently, let us know.
Hi @mattodd
I didn't do anything with the Master list I just downloaded the list the day i was given access to the list.
I have a copy offline
Time: July 6th (12 noon UK, 1pm EU, 9pm Aus) Timezones.
The Outlook invite can be found here
Location: https://uni-sydney.zoom.us/j/99281549497. In case of failure, use https://ucl.zoom.us/j/99789829423 and in case of double failure use MycetOS meeting teams link Chair: ErasmusMC Minute taker: USyd Previous meeting: #6 Recording: https://youtu.be/BM88SKPsLdM Present: @mattodd @wwjvdsande @dmitrij176 @bebi78 @MA-Jjingyi @MFernflower @KlementineJBS Apologies: none
AGENDA
Series 1 - Fenarimols
Final Molecules/SAR Gaps
@fantasy121 completed the selection of Epichem molecules, and the next step is to get them to Wendy.
@fantasy121 shared the list of compounds that have been shipped from Sydney to ErasmusMC.
[ ] @MA-Jjingyi to evaluate these latest fenarimols and post data to the Master List.
[ ] @mattodd to email the finalised list to Epichem (was there a query about whether the relationship between Epichem and DNDi still existed?)
[x] @meh-cyprian to proceed to try to model fenarimol compounds in potential protein target here, or to clarify what more data are needed. Aim is to better understand the SAR via docking vs homology model of protein.
Paper:
[ ] @dmitrij176 to upload offline copy of fenarimol lab notebook to UCL respository and provide link (@fantasy121 is https://doi.org/10.25910/CS81-G976). @mattodd to assist with copying data over.
[x] @dmitrij176 to upload his Biological supplemental data (not in Labarchives). Link to the data: https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/6#issuecomment-1559101604
[ ] @mattodd to review final version of manuscript. Please don't go through the manuscript till @mattodd is finished. After this is done, @MA-Jjingyi and @wwjvdsande will generate an Excel sheet from our current Master List displaying all data on the fenarimols tested. In meeting: @mattodd will forward edited version of manuscript to @dmitrij176 and @fantasy121 for completion.
It was decided at the previous meeting #6 that abbreviated MYOS codes would be used for the compounds, to maintain the link between compounds in the paper and compounds in the live project. The codes needed are just the initial integers, not the batch/salt codes etc. Can also remove zeroes for readability, so e.g. MYOS7.
The cut-off for in vivo data is end of larva season 2022: In vitro data will continue to be collected in 2023 (In vivo data 2023 season might be added to later revisions of manuscript but don’t wait for this before submission)
Siderophores:
New transcriptomic data from @wwjvdsande in the galleria grain model showed that siderophores are produced (https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/What-other-molecules-to-screen/issues/10).. These siderophores might be used as a trojan horse to get molecules into the grain. Could we couple fenarimols to fungal-relevant siderophores may be to get them in? The idea of the siderophores was of interest and all partners agreed to consider whether this could be done at the different sites. There is also potential relevance to other series.
Series 2 - Aminothiazoles
Meeting between the chemistry team and the high schools took place. The contributors now all have their own targets. @KlementineJBS will be the corresponding researcher for this project at USYD (Replacement for @kym834). UCL Masters student cohort begins in late May and will report back.
Series 5 - Benzimidazoles
Oxazoles: Good potencies observed for recent compound batches (e.g. https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-1-Fenarimols/issues/82#issuecomment-1325150305). Promising because they resembled the benzimidazoles which showed potent in vivo efficacy. Some oxazoles will be tested against Falciformispora senegalensis too. This series will be evaluated in vivo in the new larval season.
@AndreaOtago has generated a new set of benzoxazoles and these will be shipped to @wwjvdsande
Series 6: ketoximes
[ ] @dmitrij176 to share the figure of the compounds that have been shipped to ErasmusMC for testing. This can be found at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-6-Ketoximes/issues/5. @dmitrij176 provided an update in the meeting on the status of the latest compounds.
Misc
DMPK measurement offer from the Wellcome Centre Anti-Infectives Research (WCAIR) at the University of Dundee, which often hosts trainees from around the world and who could run some 1st tier in vitro DMPK assays for MycetOS compounds as part of the training set for these folks. They have one trainee coming this July for 3 months and they could start doing this, if of interest. A meeting was held on June 16th to discuss. @bebi78 has made suggestions at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/6#issuecomment-1600655716, and some earlier comments were at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/5#issuecomment-1538392028.
MMV Global Health Priority Box screened against Madurella mycetomatis and Falciformispora senegalensis. The data are uploaded in the Master List. Are there any standout hits - yes! MMV1593278, MMV1804559 and MMV020335. Structures are at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Monthly-zoom-meetings/issues/6#issuecomment-1567312472. In meeting it was mentioned that the next stage is to evaluate these compounds in the in vivo model.
Rohan’s contributed compounds: 96 well plate received. To be screened. Data for these compounds here.
Kinase inhibitor library. The updated KCGS library was ordered on 1st of May. It has arrived in Erasmus MC. Bio-informatical analyses have been carried out by Mickey. @bebi78 can send some 10 targets. Action on this?
Bioinformatics: Waleed requested information on which aspect of bioinformatics should be prioritised to work on first. @wwjvdsande corresponded offline with him. This will include a Phylogenetic tree to work out relationships of various species were identified as high priorities so that we can search the literature for closely related species to Mycetoma, and for the potential structures of the drug target, which would enable us to simulate our data/estimation/computational models. In the May meeting Tariq Ayub attended from the Qasim group (need Github userID!) who will advise on what can be done in terms of future contributions.
AOB Other Updates: USYD UCL Erasmus Other sites