OpenSourceMycetoma / Series-1-Fenarimols

Open Source Mycetoma's First Series of Molecules
10 stars 3 forks source link

LogD values #22

Closed rosalynclz closed 3 years ago

rosalynclz commented 5 years ago

Hi all, I'm Rosalyn, a MPharm student at UCL currently doing a research on the relevance of LogD to the in vivo potency of compounds against eumycetoma. My aim is to compile all the LogD pH7.4 values and plot a graph of in vivo potency against LogD to determine their correlation as the preliminary results published indicated that compounds with lower lipophilicity showed better in vivo potency.

I am aware of the existence of the Google spreadsheet for all the compounds but I would like to ask if there are any other molecules beyond this paper that were tested in vivo? Once I have the values, I will need the logD values to be calculated, if you wouldn't mind @bendndi ?

rosalynclz commented 4 years ago

I have compiled the % survival values of M.mycetomatis-infected larvae into the Master List as a separate sheet and am awaiting a reply from @bendndi to help out with the generation of their pH7.4 LogD values. So far, I have only found 16 compounds with in vivo % survival values, @wwjvdsande are there any other compounds that have been tested in the larvae model that I may have missed?

wwjvdsande commented 4 years ago

@rosalynclz sorry there is no new data yet. Hopefully we will have some before the end of the larvae season but otherwise it will be next larvae season (in the spring). We have tested the toxicity of the in vitro active compounds in the last weeks and luckily did not find any toxicity. We are hopefully doing the first screenings this week and next week, however the weather has already changed here. This means that the larvae quality will become less. It could mean that we have to stop after this week if the controls are dying as well.

wwjvdsande commented 4 years ago

@rosalynclz i don't know if it will help but we tested in the past terbinafin, amphotericin B (the classical one, not the liposomal ones) and several azoles for efficacy in the larval model. They were not all active. Terbinafin showed activity and amphotericin b showed activity but most of the azoles did not at the concentration tested. So that might be helpful as well. PMID: 28992315 Currently the azoles are still the most important drugs for treating mycetoma. Don't know if there is much difference in the logD values between the different azoles. However if you find azoles which are available (or even better which have been used clinically) which have a logD value which matches the ones of the fenarimols with activity we could try to test those in the model as well.

bendndi commented 4 years ago

@rosalynclz Updated master sheet with LogD from Stardrop

rosalynclz commented 4 years ago

@bendndi Thank you for your help. Would you mind generating LogD values for a couple more molecules (boxes in light orange) in the sheet?

rosalynclz commented 4 years ago

@wwjvdsande Thank you for suggesting to include other azoles (ITZ, KTZ, VCZ), terbinafine and AmpB and I have updated to included them in the Master list. However, in wanting to compile the in vivo larvae survival values from the PMID: 28992315 article, there are no raw data available for all the tested drugs from the article text or supplementary docx, and it is not possible to obtain them from the graph in Fig.4 (shown below) image. Would it be possible for you to provide me with the in vivo larvae survival values since I am unable to obtain them from the image of the graph?

wwjvdsande commented 4 years ago

@rosalynclz not a problem. I will try to do that today.

MFernflower commented 4 years ago

Nice graphs

bendndi commented 4 years ago

@rosalynclz I updated the master sheet with Stardrop LogDs - note however that it is not really that relevant to compare calculated LogDs across different chemotypes - withi a particular chemotype the relative rank ordering of calculated logD is usuall yvery good, but they are notoriously unrelaiable when comparing across different chemical series.

wwjvdsande commented 4 years ago

@rosalynclz I checked the survival percentages in the raw data for these graphs: AMB: 23.26% TBF: 20.45% VCZ: 11.11% ITZ: 6.67% KTZ: 6.67% PCZ: 4.44%

These survival curves were generated on human pharmacokinetic equivalent dosages, unlike in mycetOS were we used a fixed amount. For PCZ for instance, the dosage used here was roughly half of what was used in the MycetOS experiment. This also explains why in this paper we did not find enhanced survival for PCZ while in mycetOS we did.

MFernflower commented 4 years ago

@wwjvdsande im just curious - what is the dosage of posaconazole needed to kill the mold in vitro?

mattodd commented 3 years ago

I finally uploaded Rosalyn Chan's very nice thesis that includes all this work - sorry for the delay and thanks to all those generous souls who helped Rosalyn with her calculations and ideas. The thesis is here with a CC-BY licence. I'll close this issue and install a link to it on the wiki at https://github.com/OpenSourceMycetoma/Series-1-Fenarimols/wiki/Current-Targets-and-Activities so this discussion is not lost - there are some original things in the above we may not have captured in the wiki yet.