Closed martinratinaud closed 2 years ago
A new suggestion has been made through the Contribution Tool. You can see this declaration suggestion online or on your local instance if you have one set up.
As a human reviewer, here are the things you should check:
Geizhals
matches what you see on the web page, and it complies with the guidelines.Geizhals
(i.e. the name of the file) is derived from the service name according to the guidelines.Commercial Terms
is appropriate for this document: if you read out loud the document type tryptich, you can say that “this document describes how the writer
commits to handle the object
for its audience
”..tos-content
rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div
).
This suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can see this declaration suggestion online or on your local instance if you have one set up.
Bots should take care of checking the formatting and the validity of the declaration. As a human reviewer, you should check:
Geizhals
matches what you see on the web page, and it complies with the guidelines.Geizhals
(i.e. the name of the file) is derived from the service name according to the guidelines.Commercial Terms
is appropriate for this document: if you read out loud the document type tryptich, you can say that “this document describes how thewriter
commits to handle theobject
for itsaudience
”.If no document type seems appropriate for this document yet it is relevant to track in this instance, please check if there is already an open discussion about such a type and reference your case there, or open a new discussion if not.
Thanks to your work and attention, Open Terms Archive will ensure that high quality data is available for all reusers, enabling them to do their part in shifting the balance of power towards end users and regulators instead of spending time collecting and cleaning documents 💪