Bots should take care of checking the formatting and the validity of the declaration. As a human reviewer, you should check:
[ ] Selectors are:
stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
[ ] Generated version is:
relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
readable: it is complete and not mangled.
clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.
Thanks to your work and attention, Open Terms Archive will ensure that high quality data is available for all reusers, enabling them to do their part in shifting the balance of power towards end users and regulators instead of spending time collecting and cleaning documents πͺ
_This update suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents.
You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up._
π Inspect this declaration update suggestion
Bots should take care of checking the formatting and the validity of the declaration. As a human reviewer, you should check:
.tos-content
rather than.ab23 .cK_drop > div
).Thanks to your work and attention, Open Terms Archive will ensure that high quality data is available for all reusers, enabling them to do their part in shifting the balance of power towards end users and regulators instead of spending time collecting and cleaning documents πͺ
_This update suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up._