Add TestMartin Brand Guidelines

🔎 Inspect the updated declaration suggestion

A new suggestion has been made, voiding the previous ones.

As a human reviewer, here are the things you should check:

[ ] The suggested document matches the scope of this instance: it targets a service in the language, jurisdiction, and industry that are part of those described for this instance.
[ ] The service name TestMartin matches what you see on the web page, and it complies with the guidelines.
[ ] The service ID TestMartin (i.e. the name of the file) is derived from the service name according to the guidelines.
[ ] The document type Brand Guidelines is appropriate for this document: if you read out loud the document type tryptich, you can say that “this document describes how the writer commits to handle the object for its audience”.
[ ] Selectors are:
- stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
- simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
[ ] Generated version is:
- relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
- readable: it is complete and not mangled.
- clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.
- -

This suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up.

🔎 Inspect the updated declaration suggestion

A new suggestion has been made, voiding the previous ones.

As a human reviewer, here are the things you should check:

[ ] The suggested document matches the scope of this instance: it targets a service in the language, jurisdiction, and industry that are part of those described for this instance.
[ ] The service name TestMartin matches what you see on the web page, and it complies with the guidelines.
[ ] The service ID TestMartin (i.e. the name of the file) is derived from the service name according to the guidelines.
[ ] The document type Brand Guidelines is appropriate for this document: if you read out loud the document type tryptich, you can say that “this document describes how the writer commits to handle the object for its audience”.
[ ] Selectors are:
- stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
- simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
[ ] Generated version is:
- relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
- readable: it is complete and not mangled.
- clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.
- -

This suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up.

Test in conversation

🔎 Inspect the updated declaration suggestion

A new suggestion has been made, voiding the previous ones.

As a human reviewer, here are the things you should check:

[ ] The suggested document matches the scope of this instance: it targets a service in the language, jurisdiction, and industry that are part of those described for this instance.
[ ] The service name TestMartin matches what you see on the web page, and it complies with the guidelines.
[ ] The service ID TestMartin (i.e. the name of the file) is derived from the service name according to the guidelines.
[ ] The document type Brand Guidelines is appropriate for this document: if you read out loud the document type tryptich, you can say that “this document describes how the writer commits to handle the object for its audience”.
[ ] Selectors are:
- stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
- simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
[ ] Generated version is:
- relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
- readable: it is complete and not mangled.
- clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.
- -

This suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up.

🔎 Inspect the updated declaration suggestion

A new suggestion has been made, voiding the previous ones.

As a human reviewer, here are the things you should check:

[ ] The suggested document matches the scope of this instance: it targets a service in the language, jurisdiction, and industry that are part of those described for this instance.
[ ] The service name TestMartin matches what you see on the web page, and it complies with the guidelines.
[ ] The service ID TestMartin (i.e. the name of the file) is derived from the service name according to the guidelines.
[ ] The document type Brand Guidelines is appropriate for this document: if you read out loud the document type tryptich, you can say that “this document describes how the writer commits to handle the object for its audience”.
[ ] Selectors are:
- stable: as much as possible, the CSS selectors are meaningful and specific (e.g. .tos-content rather than .ab23 .cK_drop > div).
- simple: the CSS selectors do not have unnecessary specificity (e.g. if there is an ID, do not add a class or a tag).
[ ] Generated version is:
- relevant: it is not just a series of links, for example.
- readable: it is complete and not mangled.
- clean: it does not contain navigation links, unnecessary images, or extra content.
- -

This suggestion has been created through the Contribution Tool, which enables graphical declaration of documents. You can load it on your local instance if you have one set up.

OpenTermsArchive / sandbox-declarations