OpenThermal / libseek-thermal

SEEK thermal compact camera driver supporting the thermal Compact, thermal CompactXR and and thermal CompactPRO
MIT License
293 stars 100 forks source link

control transfer failed: LIBUSB_ERROR_PIPE #81

Open blackkarlsson opened 2 months ago

blackkarlsson commented 2 months ago

hey community!

trying to use libseek-thermal for Nano 300 (289d:0011 Seek Thermal, Inc. Nano300) and get the error in issue subj on init cam

is this a bug or Nano 300 isn't supported yet?

many thanks in advance for helping with the issue!

Bostwickenator commented 2 months ago

Not supported yet, I haven't looked into it.

blackkarlsson commented 2 months ago

@Bostwickenator Alexander, any chance you could take a look, willing to pay $$ for that :)

Razikus commented 2 months ago

Hi I would also be very interested into supporting of nano

blackkarlsson commented 2 months ago

@Razikus as a developer or supporter? ;)

anyway I'm very open to support financially this issue :) please pm me if someone open for that

Razikus commented 2 months ago

haha - I can develop it also, but I don't have yet my Nano camera, therefore I'm looking into existing solutions

Im not sure yet which camera will I choose, but I will let you know when this will happen

Bostwickenator commented 2 months ago

We aren't accepting financial support. I'll be investigating feasibility of supporting the Nano.

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, 1:57 AM Adam Raźniewski @.***> wrote:

haha - I can develop it also, but I don't have yet my Nano camera, therefore I'm looking into existing solutions

Im not sure yet which camera will I choose, but I will let you know when this will happen

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenThermal/libseek-thermal/issues/81#issuecomment-2370350679, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMOHDDSJOBGT6F6LUTCYEDZYEENJAVCNFSM6AAAAABOT7G6I6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNZQGM2TANRXHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

blackkarlsson commented 2 months ago

thanks a lot in advance, Alex!

blackkarlsson commented 2 months ago

@Bostwickenator if it would be helpful I can amazon one Nano 300 to you, let me know if needed

Bostwickenator commented 2 months ago

@blackkarlsson thanks but no, not needed. If supporting these cameras is possible it will take a while. As a side note if you need something immediately I suggest sourcing a Seek Compact Pro or Infiray P2.

blackkarlsson commented 2 months ago

I know that it might take a while, that's the reason I suggested custom development :)

P2Pro is a good one, but Nano300 has better sensor resolution(320x240 vs 256x192), so that's why I choose to test it.

it would be great if you could at least dig into how time-consuming this issue might be to have at least some insights what to do next. thanks in advance!

waayaa commented 3 weeks ago

@blackkarlsson any update on this? About to embark on integrating Nano with motion. cc: @Bostwickenator