Closed pietercolpaert closed 10 years ago
I don't really an opinion about that. In transmodel the exact term is CONNECTION LINK, so we dropped the link. (http://sitp.transmodel.org/transmodel_v5_en/pages/9facaa1b3a8a02ec.htm)
In the abstract of H Bast 2010 (http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1888969) it said : transfer pattern, i.e., the sequence of stations where a change of vehicle occurs; (2) direct connections without change of vehicle
Both are used ...
I’m in favor of using the transmodel vocabulary as much as possible, thus connection link
So it becomes connection_link?
https://github.com/OpenTransport/vocabulary/blob/development/docs/vocabulary.md
Changed to connection_link
in development branch. Will get in master if no further objections.
closes #1
Fictive example:
If I take the train from Berlin → Paris, I might cross Brussels first. In Brussels I have a 10 minute walk towards my next ride.
What do you call a "connection"? The walk from stop_point A towards stop_point B? Or is the connection the trip from Berlin → Brussels and a second one from Brussels → Paris?
How is this done in transmodel? I know Hafas uses the second option.
Would "transfer" cover the semantics in a better way?