OpenTreeOfLife / feedback

No code -- just an issue tracker for general feedback (sent here via GitHub's issues API)
1 stars 0 forks source link

Some suggestion for other taxa to constrain search for OTU mapping #36

Closed Katzlab closed 9 years ago

Katzlab commented 10 years ago

Would be good to get more comments but here is starting list:

Amoebozoa Archaeplastida, plus nested clades rhodophyceae, glaucophyta, chloroplastida Excavata Opisthokonta, plus nested clades Fungi and Metazoa SAR: plus nested clades Alveolata, Stramenopila, Rhizaria (Each of which could be nested but this may be sufficient, for now)

Archaea: might not need subnesting but here are some major clades Crenarchaeota Euryarchaeota Korarchaeota Nanoarchaeota Thaumarchaeota

Bacteria: might not need subnesting but here are some major clades Acidobacteria Actinobacteria Aquificae Armatimonadetes Bacteroidetes Candidate divisions Chlamydiae Chlorobi Chloroflexi Chrysiogenetes Cyanobacteria Deferribacteres Deinococcus-Thermus Dictyoglomi Elusimicrobia Fibrobacteres Firmicutes Fusobacteria Gemmatimonadetes Lentisphaerae Nitrospirae Planctomycetes Proteobacteria Spirochaetae Synergistetes TA06 Tenericutes Thermodesulfobacteria Thermotogae Verrucomicrobia

jar398 commented 9 years ago

This is a TNRS issue so will route this to taxomachine and close it here. Continued at https://github.com/OpenTreeOfLife/taxomachine/issues/new