Open rgazis opened 8 years ago
Example in which the MRCA "test" pinpoints problems in the tree
https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/curator/study/edit/pg_1165/?tab=trees
The MRCA of the taxa in the tree should be Nectriaceae even Dactylella ambrosia, since it is the current name for Fusarium ambrosium
BUT when searching IF for Dactylella ambrosia, this is classified as
SO…I guess OTT follows the second one because the MRCA test gives "Pezizomycotina" as result and not Nectriaceae. Could this be introducing conflict and not allowing the trees to pass through tree machine?
Romina
Hi When curating a study and trying to address the issues that pop-up in red such as:
Review all conflicting instances of a mapped taxon and choose an exemplar.
If the terminal/label causing the issue is paraphyletic e.g.
https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/curator/study/edit/pg_1669/?tab=trees&tree=tree5902
In the case of Epichloe amarillans is fine because the taxa itself is monophyletic.
But in the case of Epichloe typhina, this taxa is paraphyletic, therefore when selecting an exemplar terminal to represent that taxa we are favoring some phylogenetic relationship/placement over other.
I am assuming that the terminals that are not selected as exemplars and appear more than once in the tree are pruned?
I think this might create confusion for people uploading studies with redundant and polyphyletic taxa.
Romina