We should probably emit the tree_id separately (not just as a part of the oti_tree_id field. It would be nice if the (old) numeric study IDs were emitted with the pg prefix, too (just to cut down on confusion for folks who don't want to read about the history of how we used to have #'s only and now have moved to pg and ot_).
We should probably emit the tree_id separately (not just as a part of the
oti_tree_idfield. It would be nice if the (old) numeric study IDs were emitted with the pg prefix, too (just to cut down on confusion for folks who don't want to read about the history of how we used to have #'s only and now have moved to pg and ot_).