@mtholder correctly pointed out that my use of and here would clobber
unrelated decisions if they matched on either the study or tree ID!
The new version is hopefully a little clearer, in that it describes a
decision that matches both, then excludes it from the resulting list.
@jar398, we should definitely merge this prior to deploying the latest master to production!
@mtholder correctly pointed out that my use of
andhere would clobber unrelated decisions if they matched on either the study or tree ID! The new version is hopefully a little clearer, in that it describes a decision that matches both, then excludes it from the resulting list.@jar398, we should definitely merge this prior to deploying the latest master to production!