Closed JarbasAl closed 4 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000%
with 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 73.63%. Comparing base (
784ad94
) to head (129ff29
). Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
ovos_core/intent_services/ocp_service.py | 88.88% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Did we define "SEI" anywhere? I'm not sure I understand how those are used as a URI prefix.. They look similar to a URI scheme, but don't quite follow that syntax
Did we define "SEI" anywhere? I'm not sure I understand how those are used as a URI prefix.. They look similar to a URI scheme, but don't quite follow that syntax
those have been around for a long while now, but all we have in docs is this https://openvoiceos.github.io/ovos-technical-manual/ocp_plugins/
a StreamExtractorId is just a prefix to a real URI, SEI//URI
Opened an issue to continue discussion
filter_SEI option didnt account for using legacy audio service
config was also not being passed to the OCPPipeline