Closed mikejgray closed 9 months ago
Visually LGTM, have not tested.
@KathyReid, could you please clarify which license you meant for the original to bear? It still seems to be carrying the "delete 2/3 of this" template of yore. I assume MIT or Apache, because this dates from after the "feh copylefted Python" eureka, but we need to specify which, so that...
@mikejgray ^ that done, please amend LICENSE
to reflect that the skill is released under the Apache license 2.0, but portions derive from, list the parents and their licenses, credit the authors (Kathy in this case.) Then a break, then the full text of the license as it currently looks
@KathyReid Bump - I'd love to incorporate your Malibu Stacey work into this skill, but as Chance said, we want to make sure we get the correct licensing information.
Hi @KathyReid, I'm sure you're busy. When you get a chance would you please share the original intent for the Malibu Stacey skill license? Thank you!
Hey @mikejgray, firstly apologies for the radio silence, deep in PhD land. I'm totally open to whatever licence works best for OpenVoiceOS, however the bigger issue I see here is the licensing of the Malibu Stacey content itself - I took it from the internet somewhere, but I don't think it is open licensed. Can we claim fair use here? Not sure? And also not sure if that applies to jurisdictions outside of the United States.
Best, Kathy
@KathyReid No worries whatsoever! Thank you for responding. We'll stick with the Apache 2.0 license on the rest of the skill then. As for fair use...I'm not a lawyer, but I definitely see your point. I replaced the licensed sounds with some TTS-generated sounds instead (Nabu Casa cloud TTS, American English, Sara Neural). That should be less of an issue, I would imagine.
Addresses #28
With thanks to @KathyReid :)