search

OpenWaterAnalytics / epanet-rtx

Real-time extension to the EPANET hydraulic toolkit
Other
57 stars 43 forks source link

What happens when a scada driven model element status/setting conflicts with a model-based control and the control is enabled? #100

Open jamesuber opened 8 years ago

samhatchett commented 8 years ago

Congratulations on your 100'th issue. The answer is UB - this is an edge case i suppose, which should be handled somehow. Do you have a suggestion?

jamesuber commented 8 years ago

UB? Thinking more about it, I suppose that the answer really is - leave it to the client application to “properly” deal with. But from RTX perspective, I suppose that letting Epanet “take over” is the expected behavior. And, if that results in some weird blend of data driven and control driven - like you just changed a pipe status using a data stream at the beginning of a hydraulic time step, but Epanet changed it back using a control rule - then so be it. You get what you asked for.

On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Sam Hatchett notifications@github.com wrote:

Congratulations on your 100'th issue. The answer is UB - this is an edge case i suppose, which should be handled somehow. Do you have a suggestion?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpenWaterAnalytics/epanet-rtx/issues/100#issuecomment-245937758, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTACXPsPn5hGldBq1XraL3Zy12CM14cks5qoXOCgaJpZM4JFXmE.