Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
A few more warnings I spotted:
2015-01-01 17:38:43.958 Info, Node004, ApplicationCommandHandler - Unhandled
Command Class 0x32
2015-01-01 17:38:56.600 Info, Node006, ApplicationCommandHandler - Unhandled
Command Class 0x9c
2015-01-01 17:38:56.624 Info, Node006, ApplicationCommandHandler - Unhandled
Command Class 0x9c
2015-01-01 17:39:43.884 Info, Node004, ApplicationCommandHandler - Unhandled
Command Class 0x32
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 6:31
Just an update: A second restart of domoticz has fixed the problem where the
controller was not being recognised and I am not seeing those cpp warnings or
the Unhandled ones.
Things look better (not sure why) but I still see lots of these throughout the
log file:
2015-01-01 18:54:44.683 Warning, WARNING: Out of frame flow! (0x21). Sending
NAK.
2015-01-01 18:54:44.685 Warning, WARNING: Out of frame flow! (0x34). Sending
NAK.
2015-01-01 18:54:44.687 Warning, WARNING: Out of frame flow! (0x00). Sending
NAK.
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 7:03
The out of frame flow: indicates the serial data from the controller is getting
corrupted. Make sure no other app etc is also opening the serial port. Worst
case, you have a faulty controller.
No reports of motion etc. check the associations and the device is configured
to send the correct reports on motion ( not basic - see here
https://code.google.com/p/open-zwave/wiki/Basic_Command_Class)
The invalid ValueID message is caused by Domoticz. Please report to them.
Original comment by jus...@dynam.ac
on 1 Jan 2015 at 7:14
Sorry to add lots of comments - when I say better - i still have the issue with
the PIR not reliably being seen...
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 7:32
Bit more info - I have been playing with the on / off of the TKB devices to see
if there are other issues - sometimes the commands are immediate - other times
it can take a while before anything appears in OZW_Log.txt - perhaps that is
Domoticz but the server is not CPU bound… in the example below the command
is accepted immediate by OZW but queued for 25 seconds - is this normal?
2015-01-01 19:46:36.994 Info, Node003, Value::Set - COMMAND_CLASS_SWITCH_BINARY
- Switch - 0 - 1 - True
2015-01-01 19:46:36.994 Info, Node003, SwitchBinary::Set - Setting node 3 to On
2015-01-01 19:46:36.994 Detail, Node003, Queuing (Send) SwitchBinaryCmd_Set
(Node=3): 0x01, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x13, 0x03, 0x03, 0x25, 0x01, 0xff, 0x25, 0xbc, 0xa4
2015-01-01 19:46:36.994 Detail, Node003, Queuing (Send) SwitchBinaryCmd_Get
(Node=3): 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x13, 0x03, 0x02, 0x25, 0x02, 0x25, 0xbd, 0x5b
2015-01-01 19:46:44.142 Detail, Node004, Received: 0x01, 0x14, 0x00, 0x04,
0x00, 0x04, 0x0e, 0x32, 0x02, 0x21, 0x34, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xc0
2015-01-01 19:46:44.143 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:46:44.143 Detail, Node004, Refreshed Value: old value=false, new
value=false, type=bool
2015-01-01 19:46:44.143 Detail, Node004, Changes to this value are not verified
2015-01-01 19:46:44.143 Info, Node004, Received Meter report from node 4:
Power=0.0W
2015-01-01 19:46:44.143 Detail, Node004, Refreshed Value: old value=0.0, new
value=0.0, type=string
2015-01-01 19:46:44.143 Detail, Node004, Changes to this value are not verified
2015-01-01 19:47:01.106 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.106 Info, Node003, Sending (Send) message (Attempt 2,
Callback ID=0xbe, Expected Reply=0x13) - SwitchBinaryCmd_Set (Node=3): 0x01,
0x0a, 0x00, 0x13, 0x03, 0x03, 0x25, 0x01, 0x00, 0x25, 0xbe, 0x59
2015-01-01 19:47:01.208 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x04, 0x01, 0x13,
0x01, 0xe8
2015-01-01 19:47:01.208 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA delivered to Z-Wave
stack
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x07, 0x00, 0x13,
0xbe, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x57
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA Request with callback
ID 0xbe received (expected 0xbe)
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Info, Node003, Request RTT 122 Average Request RTT 153
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail, Node003, Expected reply was received
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail, Node003, Message transaction complete
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail, Node003, Removing current message
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.229 Info, Node003, Sending (Send) message (Callback
ID=0xbb, Expected Reply=0x04) - SwitchBinaryCmd_Get (Node=3): 0x01, 0x09, 0x00,
0x13, 0x03, 0x02, 0x25, 0x02, 0x25, 0xbb, 0x5d
2015-01-01 19:47:01.246 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x04, 0x01, 0x13,
0x01, 0xe8
2015-01-01 19:47:01.246 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA delivered to Z-Wave
stack
2015-01-01 19:47:01.264 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x07, 0x00, 0x13,
0xbb, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x52
2015-01-01 19:47:01.264 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA Request with callback
ID 0xbb received (expected 0xbb)
2015-01-01 19:47:01.264 Info, Node003, Request RTT 34 Average Request RTT 93
2015-01-01 19:47:01.282 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x04,
0x00, 0x03, 0x03, 0x25, 0x03, 0x00, 0xd4
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Info, Node003, Response RTT 53 Average Response RTT 54
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Info, Node003, Received SwitchBinary report from node
3: level=Off
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail, Node003, Refreshed Value: old value=false, new
value=false, type=bool
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail, Node003, Changes to this value are not verified
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail, Node003, Expected reply and command class was
received
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail, Node003, Message transaction complete
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.283 Detail, Node003, Removing current message
2015-01-01 19:47:01.288 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.288 Info, Node003, Sending (Send) message (Callback
ID=0xbc, Expected Reply=0x13) - SwitchBinaryCmd_Set (Node=3): 0x01, 0x0a, 0x00,
0x13, 0x03, 0x03, 0x25, 0x01, 0xff, 0x25, 0xbc, 0xa4
2015-01-01 19:47:01.305 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x04, 0x01, 0x13,
0x01, 0xe8
2015-01-01 19:47:01.305 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA delivered to Z-Wave
stack
2015-01-01 19:47:01.325 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x07, 0x00, 0x13,
0xbc, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x55
2015-01-01 19:47:01.325 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA Request with callback
ID 0xbc received (expected 0xbc)
2015-01-01 19:47:01.325 Info, Node003, Request RTT 37 Average Request RTT 65
2015-01-01 19:47:01.326 Detail, Node003, Expected reply was received
2015-01-01 19:47:01.326 Detail, Node003, Message transaction complete
2015-01-01 19:47:01.326 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.326 Detail, Node003, Removing current message
2015-01-01 19:47:01.326 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.326 Info, Node003, Sending (Send) message (Callback
ID=0xbd, Expected Reply=0x04) - SwitchBinaryCmd_Get (Node=3): 0x01, 0x09, 0x00,
0x13, 0x03, 0x02, 0x25, 0x02, 0x25, 0xbd, 0x5b
2015-01-01 19:47:01.342 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x04, 0x01, 0x13,
0x01, 0xe8
2015-01-01 19:47:01.342 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA delivered to Z-Wave
stack
2015-01-01 19:47:01.364 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x07, 0x00, 0x13,
0xbd, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x54
2015-01-01 19:47:01.365 Detail, Node003, ZW_SEND_DATA Request with callback
ID 0xbd received (expected 0xbd)
2015-01-01 19:47:01.365 Info, Node003, Request RTT 38 Average Request RTT 51
2015-01-01 19:47:01.381 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x04,
0x00, 0x03, 0x03, 0x25, 0x03, 0xff, 0x2b
2015-01-01 19:47:01.381 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.381 Info, Node003, Response RTT 54 Average Response RTT 54
2015-01-01 19:47:01.381 Info, Node003, Received SwitchBinary report from node
3: level=On
2015-01-01 19:47:01.382 Detail, Node003, Refreshed Value: old value=false, new
value=true, type=bool
2015-01-01 19:47:01.382 Detail, Node003, Changes to this value are not verified
2015-01-01 19:47:01.382 Detail, Node003, Expected reply and command class was
received
2015-01-01 19:47:01.383 Detail, Node003, Message transaction complete
2015-01-01 19:47:01.383 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:01.383 Detail, Node003, Removing current message
2015-01-01 19:47:02.936 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x04,
0x00, 0x03, 0x03, 0x25, 0x03, 0xff, 0x2b
2015-01-01 19:47:02.936 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:02.936 Info, Node003, Received SwitchBinary report from node
3: level=On
2015-01-01 19:47:02.936 Detail, Node003, Refreshed Value: old value=true, new
value=true, type=bool
2015-01-01 19:47:02.936 Detail, Node003, Changes to this value are not verified
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Detail, Node003, Received: 0x01, 0x14, 0x00, 0x04,
0x00, 0x03, 0x0e, 0x32, 0x02, 0x21, 0x34, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xa7
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Detail,
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Detail, Node003, Refreshed Value: old value=false, new
value=false, type=bool
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Detail, Node003, Changes to this value are not verified
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Info, Node003, Received Meter report from node 3:
Power=112.4W
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Detail, Node003, Refreshed Value: old value=0.0, new
value=112.4, type=string
2015-01-01 19:47:04.027 Detail, Node003, Changes to this value are not verified
Do these problems indicate an rf issue?
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 7:49
Thank you jus…@dynam.ac - I have a Aeon Labs stick on order also as a
fallback so I'll try that and if the problems vanish put it down to the UZB!
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 10:10
Another possible jus…@dynamic.ac - I am using a VM on top of VMware ESXi so
the USB is connected to the Hypervisor - but I've seen no issues with other USB
devices e.g. USB Sound, RFXCom etc.
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 10:21
I set the speed to 9600 with stty before running which may have made it more
stable but I still get the out of frame errors. An lsof on /dev/ttyACM0 shows
Domoticz only.
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 11:14
[deleted comment]
I added a timeout to the controller to reset it which may help… but I think
there is something wrong with this device… and I can't use z-way as it's not
supported yet… the following shows the level of errors...
23:17:03.254 Always,
***************************************************************************
2015-01-01 23:17:03.254 Always, ********************* Cumulative Network
Statistics *********************
2015-01-01 23:17:03.254 Always, *** General
2015-01-01 23:17:03.254 Always, Driver run time: . . . 0 days, 0 hours, 9
minutes
2015-01-01 23:17:03.254 Always, Frames processed: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 146
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, Total messages successfully received: . . . . .
. . . . . 132
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, Total Messages successfully sent: . . . . . . .
. . . . . 46
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, ACKs received from controller: . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 50
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, *** Errors
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, Unsolicited messages received while waiting for
ACK: . . 0
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, Reads aborted due to timeouts: . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 14
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, Bad checksum errors: . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 0
2015-01-01 23:17:03.255 Always, CANs received from controller: . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 0
2015-01-01 23:17:03.256 Always, NAKs received from controller: . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 0
2015-01-01 23:17:03.256 Always, Out of frame data flow errors: . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 141
2015-01-01 23:17:03.256 Always, Messages retransmitted: . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 3
2015-01-01 23:17:03.256 Always, Messages dropped and not delivered: . . . . . .
. . . . . 1
2015-01-01 23:17:03.256 Always,
***************************************************************************
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 11:25
Update - replaced the USB UZB stick with Aeon Labs V2, fresh install of
Domoticz and OZW and all of the problems have been solved - no more errors and
solid reliable comms with the devices… so the question is VMware USB
passthrough, the stick, a faulty stick or an incompatibility… if I had more
time I would connect to a physical server instead of a VM and find out...
Original comment by whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2015 at 10:26
Closing this
Original comment by jus...@dynam.ac
on 6 Jan 2015 at 5:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
whiteduc...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2015 at 6:12Attachments: