Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
minor fix to pst02-1c.xml
Original comment by ugo.v...@gmail.com
on 14 Mar 2015 at 12:46
Attachments:
Hi again... I'm experiencing an issue with that sensor:
Open the door sensor contact an leave it open:
2015-03-18 19:53:44.686 Detail, Node008, Received: 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0xff, 0x27 2015-03-18 19:53:44.688 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:53:44.689 Info, Node008, Received Basic set from node 8: level=255. Sending event notification. 2015-03-18 19:53:44.691 Warning, Exception: Manager.cpp:1482 - 101 - Invalid ValueID passed to GetValueLabel 2015-03-18 19:53:44.727 Detail, Node008, Received: 0x01, 0x08, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0x02, 0x98, 0x40, 0x21 2015-03-18 19:53:44.729 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:53:44.731 Info, Node008, Received SecurityCmd_NonceGet from node 8 2015-03-18 19:53:44.732 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:53:44.734 Detail, Node008, Queuing (WakeUp) SecurityCmd_NonceReport (Node=8): 0x01, 0x11, 0x00, 0x13, 0x08, 0x0a, 0x98, 0x80, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0x05, 0x4c, 0xae
still open but the door senso send this after near 30 seconds:
2015-03-18 19:54:16.380 Detail, Node008, Received: 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0x00, 0xd8 2015-03-18 19:54:16.382 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:54:16.383 Info, Node008, Received Basic set from node 8: level=0. Sending event notification. 2015-03-18 19:54:16.386 Warning, Exception: Manager.cpp:1482 - 101 - Invalid ValueID passed to GetValueLabel
of course, now my controller (domoticz) think the contact is closed...
If I manually close the sensor I get this:
2015-03-18 19:57:21.116 Detail, Node008, Received: 0x01, 0x08, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0x02, 0x98, 0x40, 0x21 2015-03-18 19:57:21.118 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:57:21.119 Info, Node008, Received SecurityCmd_NonceGet from node 8 2015-03-18 19:57:21.121 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:57:21.123 Detail, Node008, Queuing (WakeUp) SecurityCmd_NonceReport (Node=8): 0x01, 0x11, 0x00, 0x13, 0x08, 0x0a, 0x98, 0x80, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0x05, 0x4d, 0xaf 2015-03-18 19:57:25.864 Detail, Node008, Received: 0x01, 0x09, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0x00, 0xd8 2015-03-18 19:57:25.866 Detail, 2015-03-18 19:57:25.868 Info, Node008, Received Basic set from node 8: level=0. Sending event notification. 2015-03-18 19:57:25.870 Warning, Exception: Manager.cpp:1482 - 101 - Invalid ValueID passed to GetValueLabel
I get a double basic set only when the contact is open... So where could be the problem? Door Sensor? Domoticz or OZW?
the "Exception: Manager.cpp:1482 - 101 - Invalid ValueID passed to GetValueLabel" is domoticz related? I must fill a but into domoticz bug tracking?
Regards
Related to Issue #352. WIP at the moment.
Hello, I bought a Philio PST02-A and a Philio PST02-1A. I use homegenie home automation that use openzwave. The first is working, the second one no :( How I can help?
Hi, have you solved the problem with the sensor PST02-1A?
I've solved using InControlHA https://www.incontrolha.com/devicelibrary/viewDevice/52/Philio-4-in-1-Multi-Sensor
This should be fixed now that we have merged the Security updates into the master branch.
I have still problem. Maybe i found that the association of group 1 is missing. I try to set to 1 but doesn t work. Do you think is the controller the problem ( aotec z-stick usb 2). Maybe with new gen5 z-stick will work?
Maybe sensors gen5 need a controller gen5?
hi I have lot of gen5 device with a z-stick V2 and they work as expected. do you have akk node information, about product type, product Id, manufact Id ? Some time i don't have group for this case
The device is this: http://www.pepper1.net/zwavedb/device/575
but when I try to add the association with group 1 the result is:
2015-07-03 22:31:20.475 Error, Node009, ERROR: Dropping command, expected response not received after 1 attempt(s)
The sensor is awake.
I try since 3 month... with a lot opensurce software but measures doesn t appear... Only alarm type and alarm level are coming.
I compared with the older version (not zwave plus) : http://www.pepper1.net/zwavedb/device/585 vs new one http://www.pepper1.net/zwavedb/device/575
and difference is the column "Secure". Is it possibile that a controller not gen 5 (my key usb controller) doesn't integrate a coomunication Secure (Security: AES-128 encryption)?
It seem a good reason, because I have a aotec sensor gen5 and it works, but it is compatible with both "secure" and "non secure": http://www.pepper1.net/zwavedb/device/640
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ugo.v...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2015 at 11:09Attachments: