Closed ericnordelo closed 3 months ago
I think we can update Creating a token receiver contract to use ERC721ReceiverMixinImpl as well to clean up the snippet. WDYT?
The only issue I see with the approach is inconsistency. For example, the ERC721 in the same page is not using mixins, and I think we should update that as well. Let's let it for a different issue if you agree.
Fixes #913
This PR adds the missing documentation for the ERC721ReceiverComponent, and also fixes the name of the mixin implementation.
PR Checklist