Closed andrew-fleming closed 3 weeks ago
Hey @ericglau I reviewed the output, refactored the hooks a bit, and compiled locally. Why can't I see the deploy preview though, does every commit need to be approved?. Note that is harder to review without it even for myself.
Btw it took me 66 minutes to compile 😢
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
Package | New capabilities | Transitives | Size | Publisher |
---|---|---|---|---|
npm/@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@5.1.0 | None | 0 |
1.31 MB | amxx |
npm/@openzeppelin/contracts@5.1.0 | None | 0 |
1.97 MB | ernestognw |
npm/hardhat@2.22.14 | None | 0 |
2.62 MB | alcuadrado, fvictorio, fzeoli, ...3 more |
npm/jszip@3.10.1 | None | 0 |
762 kB | stuk |
npm/solidity-ast@0.4.59 | None | 0 |
237 kB | frangio |
🚮 Removed packages: npm/ethereum-cryptography@3.0.0
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Alert | Package | Note | CI |
---|---|---|---|
High CVE | npm/rollup@2.79.2 |
| 🚫 |
Contains a high severity Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE).
Remove or replace dependencies that include known high severity CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.
Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.
If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.
To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore
followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version
specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0
or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all
@SocketSecurity ignore npm/rollup@2.79.2
The rollup
issue does not look correct, as I don't see version 2.79.2
being used anywhere in the project.
@SocketSecurity ignore npm/rollup@2.79.2
This PR proposes to move the votes logic to common-components. This PR also proposes to include votes functionality for erc721.
I ran
yarn run update_scarb_project
on the test project and compiled...after 24 short minutes, there are no errors or warnings :)