0 passing (651ms)
1 failing
1) MyContract -test
deployer is owner:
AssertionError: expected '0xfFE4F5402572690aA3e9bd5506bDA86F609007c7' to equal '0x22685263387BcdE0B5364aeAaf0334E7775dC7A0'
+ expected - actual
-0xfFE4F5402572690aA3e9bd5506bDA86F609007c7
+0x22685263387BcdE0B5364aeAaf0334E7775dC7A0
Did i miss something?
The ownable contract:
abstract contract Ownable is Context {
address private _owner;
event OwnershipTransferred(address indexed previousOwner, address indexed newOwner);
/**
* @dev Initializes the contract setting the deployer as the initial owner.
*/
constructor () {
address msgSender = _msgSender();
_owner = msgSender;
emit OwnershipTransferred(address(0), msgSender);
}
/**
* @dev Returns the address of the current owner.
*/
function owner() public view virtual returns (address) {
return _owner;
}
/**
* @dev Throws if called by any account other than the owner.
*/
modifier onlyOwner() {
require(owner() == _msgSender(), "Ownable: caller is not the owner");
_;
}
/**
* @dev Leaves the contract without owner. It will not be possible to call
* `onlyOwner` functions anymore. Can only be called by the current owner.
*
* NOTE: Renouncing ownership will leave the contract without an owner,
* thereby removing any functionality that is only available to the owner.
*/
function renounceOwnership() public virtual onlyOwner {
emit OwnershipTransferred(_owner, address(0));
_owner = address(0);
}
/**
* @dev Transfers ownership of the contract to a new account (`newOwner`).
* Can only be called by the current owner.
*/
function transferOwnership(address newOwner) public virtual onlyOwner {
require(newOwner != address(0), "Ownable: new owner is the zero address");
emit OwnershipTransferred(_owner, newOwner);
_owner = newOwner;
}
}
At first I thought _msgSender() must be wrong, but changing that to msg.sender doesn't help
Hey so, I just discovered this and I tried running it using an Ownable contract using the simple example from docs:
This failed on first try:
Did i miss something?
The ownable contract:
At first I thought
_msgSender()
must be wrong, but changing that tomsg.sender
doesn't help