OpeningDesign / 1850_Hoffman_St

0 stars 0 forks source link

20141020 - Sketches #1

Open theoryshaw opened 9 years ago

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

Hi Aqdus,

Here's a couple revisions... https://www.dropbox.com/sh/z99622kj7jn10dw/AABTPVq9JMZR_q9w1Dg2jClja?dl=0

Also, how's skyscraper working for you? Still slow? If so, here's the latest file, to work locally if you need it.... https://www.dropbox.com/s/33jf3opsnzg5md6/20141020_1850_Hoffman_St.rvt?dl=0

Thanks Much, Ryan

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Hello Ryan, I didn't get your email yesterday. I have added some more work, will be grateful if you cud provide me the latest file from your cloud account to work locally. Skyscraper is working fine for me but it's still not as efficient as my local machine work is. Also I am using Revit 2014 on my machine, please provide me file which is compatible for that or I'll install Revit 2015. I now have received the sketches for modifications, will work on them in my next session. For profile review, I guess I need to contact odesk support for resolution of the issue. Thanks, Aqdus

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

Hi @araqdas Let's just stay in Skyscraper, if we can. Let me know if it's too painful.

I'm bringing someone else in to help as well. That way, we can all work together.

Thanks.

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Ok Ryan. If there are more people then skyscraper is fine to work. It's just that everything takes me double time to work on skyscraper. Most I can do is to create families in my local machine, which are going to be used in project, and then upload them on skyscraper. Let me know about the deadlines of the project as well. I might be unavailable to work tomorrow. Will continue working from the next day.

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 21-Oct-2014, at 7:53 pm, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi @araqdas Let's just stay in Skyscraper, if we can. Let me know if it's too painful.

I'm bringing someone else in to help as well. That way, we can all work together.

Thanks.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

Hi @araqdas

Would like to have some renderings by the beginning of the week.

I might do the renderings, we'll see if i have time.

btw. @araqdas meet @testingwaters, @testingwaters meet @araqdas :)

@araqdas is helping on the 'wire railing' scheme.

and @testingwaters is helping with the 'laser cut railing' scheme. Similar to this

Would you guys work together on how best you would like to sepearte the schemes? Whether using Revit's 'design options', or Revit's 'filters'.

Thanks!

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Hello Ryan Ok will start working on renderings from next week. Hello Testingwaters, Nice to see you. I propose to separate these schemes by using filters.

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 22 Oct 2014, at 22:20, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi @araqdas

Would like to have some renderings by the beginning of the week.

I might do the renderings, we'll see if i have time.

btw. @araqdas meet @testingwaters, @testingwaters meet @araqdas :)

@araqdas is helping on the 'wire railing' scheme.

and @testingwaters is helping with the 'laser cut railing' scheme. Similar to this

Would you guys work together on how best you would like to sepearte the schemes? Whether using Revit's 'design options', or Revit's 'filters'.

Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

vykrum commented 9 years ago

Aqdus,

Nice to be collaborating like this. I haven't really explored filters, but will figure it out.

However, I think Design Options is well suited to what we are trying to do here. Shouldn't make much of a difference in any case.

We'll look at ways to incorporate, once I model the railing.

Regards, Vikram Subbaiah

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:33 PM, araqdas notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello Ryan Ok will start working on renderings from next week. Hello Testingwaters, Nice to see you. I propose to separate these schemes by using filters.

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 22 Oct 2014, at 22:20, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi @araqdas

Would like to have some renderings by the beginning of the week.

I might do the renderings, we'll see if i have time.

btw. @araqdas meet @testingwaters, @testingwaters meet @araqdas :)

@araqdas is helping on the 'wire railing' scheme.

and @testingwaters is helping with the 'laser cut railing' scheme. Similar to this

Would you guys work together on how best you would like to sepearte the schemes? Whether using Revit's 'design options', or Revit's 'filters'.

Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/OpeningDesign/1850_Hoffman_St/issues/1#issuecomment-60127950 .

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Hi Ryan, I have updated the model as per the revisions marked. Have modified the model as follows

Adjustment the balcony seating 2D kitchen layout on 2nd floor Curtain wall adjustment with 2"X6" mullions Provision of wire railing as per the detail provided(with handrail and steel plate) Adjustment of balcony floor level Addition of ceiling Please review the model and provide comments. Model is saved with latest date at the end.

Vikram, Ok. We can go with design options. I have modeled the railing and have assigned it "Option 1 Set-->Wire Railing_AS"

Regards,

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

Hi Aqdus,

Going forward (if it's not to painful due to lagging issues), lets use the '1850_Hoffman-St.rvt' located in 'Autodesk 360'

I saved Aqdus's model there.

Let's use the 'Cloud' to save revit families, and archives.

We'll use github to save everything else.

I would like to use 'Revit filters', instead, to separate the various schemes/options. (Among other reasons, they export out via IFC. 'Design Options' do not)

In that '1850_Hoffman-St.rvt' file, I've created the following view templates to easily flip between schemes...

The way it works, is for those revit objects 'NOT' part of a particular scheme, put 'N' in the parameter value. Parameter values have the same name...

Would it be possible to have the 2 schemes done by monday? (the wire railing scheme is basically done)

I plan on working on the renderings--i will do that on monday.

Thanks!

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Ok. It's great to separate the schemes by using filters. Sure. Let me know on what lines should be the other design scheme and I'll work on it tomorrow.

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 24 Oct 2014, at 19:22, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi Aqdus,

Going forward (if it's not to painful due to lagging issues), lets use the '1850_Hoffman-St.rvt' located in 'Autodesk 360'

I saved Aqdus's model there.

Let's use the 'Cloud' to save revit families, and archives.

We'll use github to save everything else.

I would like to use 'Revit filters', instead, to separate the various schemes/options.

In that '1850_Hoffman-St.rvt' file, I've created the following view templates to easily flip between schemes...

OD_Options_1 OD_Options_2 OD_Options_3 The way it works, is for those revit objects 'NOT' part of a particular scheme, put 'N' in the parameter value. Parameter values have the same name...

OD_Options_1 OD_Options_2 OD_Options_3 Would it be possible to have the 2 schemes done by monday? (the wire railing scheme is basically done)

I plan on working on the renderings--i will do that on monday.

Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

araqdas commented 9 years ago

About worksharing, you mean that after opening skyscraper, I should access the file from Autodesk 360, moving forward?

Yes, if the project had to be shared between 3 people then working on skyscraper is fine even if it's a bit painful but it's good for sharing project file, so I'll continue working on it.

Please let me know about the other design option or let me know if I should propose it myself, as it's Saturday tomorrow and I'll be able to spe3nd more time on project, if I know what I have to do.

Thanks much,

Aqdus

Sent from Surface Pro

From: Ryan Schultz Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎October‎ ‎24‎, ‎2014 ‎7‎:‎22‎ ‎PM To: OpeningDesign/1850_Hoffman_St Cc: Aqdas Shaheen

Hi Aqdus,

Going forward (if it's not to painful due to lagging issues), lets use the '1850_Hoffman-St.rvt' located in 'Autodesk 360'

I saved Aqdus's model there.

Let's use the 'Cloud' to save revit families, and archives.

We'll use github to save everything else.

I would like to use 'Revit filters', instead, to separate the various schemes/options.

In that '1850_Hoffman-St.rvt' file, I've created the following view templates to easily flip between schemes... OD_Options_1 OD_Options_2 OD_Options_3

The way it works, is for those revit objects 'NOT' part of a particular scheme, put 'N' in the parameter value. Parameter values have the same name... OD_Options_1 OD_Options_2 OD_Options_3

Would it be possible to have the 2 schemes done by monday? (the wire railing scheme is basically done)

I plan on working on the renderings--i will do that on monday.

Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

I should access the file from Autodesk 360, moving forward?

yes, correct. That's the location where we all can work in real-time.

For this first iteration there won't be an option 3. I just put it in there for future expansion, potentially.

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Ok. That means I should propose myself, the option 3?

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 24 Oct 2014, at 21:20, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

I should access the file from Autodesk 360, moving forward?

yes, correct. That's the location where we all can work in real-time.

For this first iteration there won't be an option 3. I just put it in there for future expansion, potentially.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

No, no option 3.

Thanks.

araqdas commented 9 years ago

No work for tomorrow.

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 24 Oct 2014, at 21:46, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

No, no option 3.

Thanks.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

i have a couple sketches, on Option 1, i'll send over for tomorrow. Not much though.

thx.

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Please let me know if there is anything else to do.

REGARDS AR. AQDUS SHAHEEN

Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:50:08 -0700 From: notifications@github.com To: 1850_Hoffman_St@noreply.github.com CC: ar.aqdas@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [1850_Hoffman_St] 20141020 - Sketches (#1)

i have a couple sketches, on Option 1, i'll send over for tomorrow. Not much though.

thx.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. =

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

I will, Aqdus. For now, there's nothing more.

Thanks for your help!

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Ok. So we should end the contract?

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 27 Oct 2014, at 21:51, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

I will, Aqdus. For now, there's nothing more.

Thanks for your help!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

theoryshaw commented 9 years ago

sure, np.

araqdas commented 9 years ago

Hope we get to work together in future too. Thanks

Regards, Aqdus Shaheen

Sent from my iPhone

On 27 Oct 2014, at 22:06, Ryan Schultz notifications@github.com wrote:

sure, np.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.