search

OperationCode / operationcode_infra

Platform infrastructure for the Operation Code site.
MIT License
15 stars 14 forks source link

environment promotion strategy #63

Open apex-omontgomery opened 5 years ago

apex-omontgomery commented 5 years ago

pybot/ pyback:

  1. Work locally in development, can target a test slack
  2. Push to staging branch, targets a test slack but shows what happens when deployed in ECS.
  3. Push to master, targets prod

@OperationCode/front-end and current frontend:

  1. Work locally to target whatever we set in environment variables (staging, prod)
  2. Create pull request, which on merge promotes the production to this

Backend does the same as front-end, both front-end and backend you can go into kubectl and manually target whatever container tag you'd like. When I request the current images for all pods, we'll see some oddities:

C:\Users\wimo7\Desktop> kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o jsonpath="{.items[*].spec.containers[*].image}" | tr [:space:] '\n'
operationcode/operationcode_frontend:latest
operationcode/operationcode_frontend:latest
... supporting containers...
operationcode/operationcode_backend:1245
operationcode/operationcode_backend:latest
operationcode/operationcode_backend:1245
operationcode/operationcode_backend:latest
operationcode/operationcode_frontend:2327
operationcode/operationcode_backend:1269
operationcode/operationcode_backend:1269
operationcode/operationcode_backend:1269
operationcode/operationcode_backend:1269
operationcode/operationcode_frontend:2334
operationcode/operationcode_frontend:2334
bitnami/redis:3.2.9-r2
operationcode/town-crier:latest

In the above case, we see that frontend is using both 2334and latest. while backend is using 1269, 1245 and latest.

I don't know the correct command to list the namespace for each of these. But I remember find out that we are setting staging cube as "latest" and the prod as a numerical value. I don't know why we have 3 different backend image versions.

After talking with @kylemh (IIRC) he doesn't need a way to promote a deployed code instance to staging. For their purposes it's fine to have staging only running locally. But I think going to a strategy where we promote to staging on merge to master, by tags, and then manually promote by adding a production tag would be more ideal, or automatically based on some criteria.

Our initial concern was having k instances of staging for k developers. But I don't see that as a current problem.

Lastly, we need a way that data sources (backend, pyback) RDS instances, have data in production that propagate down so that when we update those instances we can easily carry that over. I think for the time being a nightly copy over, plus ability to manually trigger, would be fine. With the knowledge that if you are working on something that requires database migrations you'll have to perform the migration again with the updated data.

kylemh commented 5 years ago

Front-end has its own staging environment, separate from our infra. It'd be smarter to be within the same infra system that everybody else is, but in terms of solving the problem - we're good for now :)

sethbergman commented 5 years ago

Happy the immediate issue is resolved. Tags are the way to go IMO and I would avoid using latest FWIW. It's automatically tagged latest if no tag is specified, and then you don't know which version you're using. I've got a bash script for versioning releases if needed.