search

OregonDigital / oregondigital

OregonDigital Hydra Application
https://oregondigital.org/catalog/
Other
25 stars 5 forks source link

[Remediation] uo-arch-photos preflight check #1518

Open sseymore opened 2 years ago

sseymore commented 2 years ago

collection_id: uo-arch-photos

Known Issues

Related Tickets

sseymore commented 2 years ago

I cannot remediate these 3. Where are they?

oregondigital:df727n01q missing required field: title oregondigital:df734956v missing required field: title oregondigital:df734956v missing required field: identifier

lsat12357 commented 2 years ago

oregondigital:df727n01q is now reachable, with a temporary title

oregondigital:df734956v is also now reachable, however I think this one should be deleted.
It was in the list of children for this cpd: https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df734d94w however, oregondigital:df734956v's content file appears to be a pdf version of these two assets which are also in the cpd https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df7349549 https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df734955k

I have already removed oregondigital:df734956v from the cpd; something about its relationship to the parent was borking it. Let me know if I have misdiagnosed the situation though

sseymore commented 2 years ago

oregondigital:df727n01q actually should not have been uploaded. can you delete?

oregondigital:df734956v Agree, delete. We did upload PDFs if there was significant text on the item, but this does not fall into that category.

lsat12357 commented 2 years ago

a new twist! the bad cpd oregondigital:df726392p is not actually missing any children, but the children failed to make it on the pidlist bc they're all missing the set. Am adding set to match parent.

lsat12357 commented 2 years ago

bad preds: http://lod.xdams.org/reload/oad/has_FindingAid #fix predicate http://schema.org/event #fix predicate http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format #remove? value is a string. is that ok? to remove the statements that use dce format with a string obj?

lsat12357 commented 2 years ago

maybe I should make the first couple of passes at fixing bad dates

sseymore commented 2 years ago

Leslie is also helping with the dates, so let me know if you want to takeover. I am almost done with the URI remediation.

sseymore commented 2 years ago

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format #remove? value is a string. is that ok? to remove the statements that use dce format with a string obj?

Yes, I think so as long as the correct DC URIs are there and have correct expected values.