Closed MTVirux closed 9 months ago
Aren't the checks just the wrong way anyway? We're checking if f
s requirements are contained in fish
s requirements,
so if the intersection of both of them is contained in fish
, fish
has more or equal restrictions to f
.
But we want to check for fish
having fewer restrictions than f
, so we need to check if the intersection against f
, not `fish.
Addresses #203 Fixed certain fishes not being marked as having uptime dependency
This was done by adding a check to see if the Goal Fish has a weather requirement at all, instead of just checking it against the mooch weather requirements.