Currently (as of #299), the output of robustness_fractions is given directly to robustness_categories. This means that the function will use changed and agree to output the agreement on the direction (strong/no change/conflicting), but not the actual direction itself.
Potential Solution
Instead of agree, I think that sending agree_positive would accomplish what I need. This could be an argument somewhere, either here in xscen or in xclim.
Addressing a Problem?
Currently (as of #299), the output of
robustness_fractionsis given directly torobustness_categories. This means that the function will usechangedandagreeto output the agreement on the direction (strong/no change/conflicting), but not the actual direction itself.Potential Solution
Instead of
agree, I think that sendingagree_positivewould accomplish what I need. This could be an argument somewhere, either here inxscenor inxclim.Additional context
I need to be able to compute the "Direction" categories used in the Hydroclimatic Atlas, with a potential 6th category for "Conflicting signals": https://cehq.gouv.qc.ca/atlas-hydroclimatique/carte-indicateurs/index.htm
Contribution