Closed AntonIsraelsson closed 2 years ago
so you mean that it counts one extra step for the whole test?
No, it seems to be off by a factor of around 2
yes well, right and left step, of course.. To be honest, on longer distances with hundreds of steps it's not a big deal, but it would be good to fix anyhow. Maybe you want to send a pull request?
To be clear it's off by over a hundred steps for each dataset. A frequency of 4 steps per second is unreasonable for most kinds of walks.
Steps Original | Steps New | Duration (s) | Steps/s, Original | Steps/s, New |
---|---|---|---|---|
398 | 198 | 107 | 3.7 | 1.9 |
455 | 248 | 132 | 3.4 | 1.9 |
475 | 243 | 137 | 3.5 | 1.8 |
535 | 270 | 138 | 3.9 | 2.0 |
427 | 261 | 138 | 3.1 | 1.9 |
516 | 263 | 139 | 3.7 | 1.9 |
517 | 260 | 142 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
557 | 284 | 143 | 3.9 | 2.0 |
380 | 195 | 144 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
411 | 206 | 144 | 2.9 | 1.4 |
523 | 275 | 144 | 3.6 | 1.9 |
514 | 272 | 144 | 3.6 | 1.9 |
537 | 277 | 144 | 3.7 | 1.9 |
532 | 266 | 145 | 3.7 | 1.8 |
529 | 265 | 145 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
533 | 267 | 146 | 3.7 | 1.8 |
497 | 255 | 147 | 3.4 | 1.7 |
468 | 280 | 147 | 3.2 | 1.9 |
505 | 257 | 147 | 3.4 | 1.7 |
493 | 285 | 148 | 3.3 | 1.9 |
533 | 268 | 151 | 3.5 | 1.8 |
485 | 282 | 151 | 3.2 | 1.9 |
605 | 305 | 152 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
611 | 306 | 152 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
517 | 278 | 152 | 3.4 | 1.8 |
533 | 266 | 152 | 3.5 | 1.8 |
581 | 295 | 153 | 3.8 | 1.9 |
643 | 322 | 159 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
646 | 323 | 162 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
565 | 288 | 162 | 3.5 | 1.8 |
582 | 292 | 163 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
585 | 302 | 164 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
473 | 289 | 165 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
547 | 312 | 168 | 3.3 | 1.9 |
571 | 302 | 169 | 3.4 | 1.8 |
575 | 299 | 169 | 3.4 | 1.8 |
537 | 303 | 171 | 3.1 | 1.8 |
577 | 311 | 173 | 3.3 | 1.8 |
515 | 330 | 176 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
557 | 316 | 177 | 3.1 | 1.8 |
528 | 306 | 180 | 2.9 | 1.7 |
465 | 314 | 187 | 2.5 | 1.7 |
693 | 362 | 189 | 3.7 | 1.9 |
370 | 277 | 189 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
707 | 364 | 191 | 3.7 | 1.9 |
431 | 301 | 192 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
502 | 335 | 208 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
463 | 365 | 219 | 2.1 | 1.7 |
I don't get it, what is off? the ground truth or the estimated steps from the algorithm?
The ground truth
I am very surprised, we validated the GT device with lab measurements. This is how the steps are counted in the app. See from line 239. It looks like it's not double counting.
I think we used those steps as GT in the optimization process, not the ones computed in stats.js. Actually I cannot remember what stats.js was used for. It was some time ago!
It might just be an error with the stats.js file, as all other file-steps seem to be correct.
How was it validated?
we validated the GT app by comparing the N of steps computed there with what was counted manually (2 separate people observed the test) over a short walk. I think the issue is only with the stats.js file, which I am not sure it was actually used for anything, so hopefully our results are not affected by it. In any case thanks for finding and correcting the issue!
If you need any help you can also write me an email at dario.salvi.work at gmail
The program counts each state change and not the number of times a person sets down their foot.
Therefore it counts two steps when we only put the foot down once:
Changing the for loop to the following seems to fix this problem.